Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
PocDoc vs Humphrey Visual Field Perimetry Testing: Analyzing a Web-Based Visual Field Assessment Tool in a Tertiary Eye Care Center
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Jue Shao Goh
    Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
  • Joewee Boon
    Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
  • William Rojas-Carabali
    Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
  • Bryan Ang
    Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
  • Rupesh Vijay Agrawal
    Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Jue Shao Goh None; Joewee Boon None; William Rojas-Carabali None; Bryan Ang None; Rupesh Agrawal None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 4822. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Jue Shao Goh, Joewee Boon, William Rojas-Carabali, Bryan Ang, Rupesh Vijay Agrawal; PocDoc vs Humphrey Visual Field Perimetry Testing: Analyzing a Web-Based Visual Field Assessment Tool in a Tertiary Eye Care Center. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):4822.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Visual field (VF) testing is a vital investigation in the detection and monitoring of VF defects. The Humphrey Visual Field (HVF) test is commonly used in clinical settings. Yet, there is a need for the development of validated home- and community-based perimetry testing. This study compares the efficacy of a web-based VF assessment tool (“PocDoc”) to conventional HVF in patients visiting a tertiary referral ophthalmology center.

Methods : This prospective observational study included 107 eyes from 82 participants, recruited from glaucoma, cataract and retina clinics, with a mean age of 60.9±13.4 years. Of the 107 eyes, 75 eyes from 61 subjects were glaucomatous with a mean MD of -6.85±6.40 dB. Based on the Glaucoma Staging System 2, 38 eyes had early glaucoma, 19 moderate glaucoma, 10 advanced glaucoma and 5 severe glaucoma, with the final 3 eyes having a positive MD. Standard 24-2 HVF and PocDoc VF tests were conducted consecutively for all subjects. PocDoc’s accuracy in detecting VF defects was calculated. Correlations between both tests, for entire VFs and individual VF quadrants, were evaluated using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient.

Results : Compared to HVF testing, PocDoc had an overall accuracy of 85.1%, with a sensitivity of 94.7%, specificity of 15.4%, positive predictive value of 89.0% and negative predictive value of 28.6%. Individual VF quadrants had similar sensitivity outcomes, but with poorer specificity. PocDoc demonstrated moderate correlation to HVF testing in identifying defects in the entire VF (r=0.504), as well as for the superonasal (r=0.551) and inferonasal quadrants (r=0.443), but showed poorer correlation for the superotemporal (r=0.357) and inferotemporal quadrants (r=0.362).

Conclusions : PocDoc is a novel home and web-based perimetry assessment tool which demonstrates good sensitivity in the detection of VF defects, exhibiting moderate correlation with HVF testing in identifying defects in the superonasal and inferonasal quadrants of the VF.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

 

(A) 24-2 HVF report. (B) Corresponding PocDoc results. 80 points across 24 degrees of vision were tested; coloured dots indicate the intensity of stimulus patients were able to see - red, orange, pink = patient unable to recognise dark, intermediate and light stimulus respectively; dark green, green, light green = patient able to recognise dark, intermediate and light stimulus respectively.

(A) 24-2 HVF report. (B) Corresponding PocDoc results. 80 points across 24 degrees of vision were tested; coloured dots indicate the intensity of stimulus patients were able to see - red, orange, pink = patient unable to recognise dark, intermediate and light stimulus respectively; dark green, green, light green = patient able to recognise dark, intermediate and light stimulus respectively.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×