Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
Effectiveness of intravitreal faricimab in a United States Veteran population
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Daniel Fraser
    University of Minnesota Twin Cities School of Medicine, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
  • Sydney Roston
    University of Minnesota Twin Cities School of Medicine, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
  • Christina Ryu
    Minneapolis VA Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
  • Karen R Armbrust
    Minneapolis VA Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
    Ophthalmology and Visual Neurosciences, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Daniel Fraser None; Sydney Roston None; Christina Ryu None; Karen Armbrust None
  • Footnotes
    Support  University of Minnesota Medical School Student Research Grant, VitreoRetinal Surgery Foundation Research Award
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 225. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Daniel Fraser, Sydney Roston, Christina Ryu, Karen R Armbrust; Effectiveness of intravitreal faricimab in a United States Veteran population. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):225.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To evaluate the effectiveness of intravitreal faricimab in alleviating disease burden in a US veteran population.

Methods : Chart review was performed for all patients with at least one intravitreal faricimab injection recorded in the US Veterans Health Administration’s Corporate Data Warehouse in 2022 (n=572 eyes of 451 patients at 33 sites). Exclusion criteria included intervening intravitreal injection of a different medication, cataract extraction in the study time frame, or incomplete chart notes at key follow-up visits. The primary study outcome was control of disease activity in the subset of eyes that received ≥3 doses of aflibercept followed by ≥3 doses of faricimab. Secondary outcomes included treatment interval length and adverse events. Differences were assessed using Fisher’s exact and paired t-tests.

Results : Mean±SD age was 74.2±8.9 years. Most patients were male (97%) and white (80%). Treatment indications were exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in 314 eyes (55%) and diabetic macular edema (DME) in 219 eyes (38%). Adverse events occurred in 5 eyes (1%).

Of the 212 eyes (167 patients) in the aflibercept-faricimab comparison subcohort, reasons for the medication switch included inadequate disease control in 88 eyes (42%) and desire to extend treatment interval in 65 eyes (31%). Inactive disease was documented in 22 eyes (10%) at the time of first faricimab injection. Following the first faricimab injection there were significantly more eyes with inactive disease in the setting of AMD (p<0.001) but not DME (p=1) (Figure 1), although there were significantly more DME eyes with disease improvement (p=0.004) (Figure 2). Short-term treatment interval duration was stable: mean±SD interval between the last aflibercept dose and the first faricimab dose was similar to the interval between the third and fourth faricimab doses for the comparison subcohort (46.5±26.8 days, 44.3±22.0 days, p = 0.29) and the subset with desired interval extension (44.2±20.4 days, 44.1±18.4 days, p = 0.97).

Conclusions : Faricimab may facilitate disease control in exudative AMD recalcitrant to aflibercept. Ongoing follow-up of this study cohort will assess the feasibility of long-term treatment interval extension with faricimab.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

 

Figure 1: Controlled disease in the aflibercept-faricimab comparison subcohort.

Figure 1: Controlled disease in the aflibercept-faricimab comparison subcohort.

 

Figure 2: Disease improvement in the aflibercept-faricimab comparison subcohort.

Figure 2: Disease improvement in the aflibercept-faricimab comparison subcohort.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×