Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
Comparison of an electronic frailty index with a sensor-based frailty estimate in glaucoma and glaucoma suspect patients
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Nicholas de la Osa
    Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
  • Qyanna Porter
    Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
  • Michael T Christensen
    Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
  • J. Brent Bond
    Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
  • Gillian Treadwell
    Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
  • Atalie C. Thompson
    Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Nicholas de la Osa None; Qyanna Porter None; Michael Christensen None; J. Brent Bond None; Gillian Treadwell None; Atalie Thompson Topcon Medical, Code C (Consultant/Contractor)
  • Footnotes
    Support  NEI 5K23EY030897
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 1896. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Nicholas de la Osa, Qyanna Porter, Michael T Christensen, J. Brent Bond, Gillian Treadwell, Atalie C. Thompson; Comparison of an electronic frailty index with a sensor-based frailty estimate in glaucoma and glaucoma suspect patients. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):1896.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : We have previously shown that glaucoma (GL) patients are more likely to be frail than glaucoma suspects (GS) using an electronic frailty index (eFI) which can be automatically estimated at the point of care, however, eFI generation requires ≥2 years of electronic health record (EHR) outpatient data. New technology can combine responses from a fall questionnaire with inertial sensor readings from a timed up and go test to generate a statistical estimate of frailty (FE). The purpose of this clinical pilot study was 1) to compare the proportion of GL/GS patients in whom a questionnaire/sensor-based FE vs. eFI could be estimated in clinic and 2) to determine the agreement of these two frailty scores.

Methods : Cross-sectional pilot of 68 GL/GS patients age ≥65 years. Participants were invited to complete a questionnaire and timed up and go test while wearing inertial sensors and these data were used to generate the statistical FE based on the Fried Frailty Index. An automated eFI was calculated if adequate data was available in the electronic health record. Kappa statistic was used to estimate the agreement of the frailty categories.

Results : Mean age was 73.9±5.5 years, with 36% black or mixed race, 46% female, and 90% GL vs 10% GS. All patients were able to complete the sensor-based FE but only 54/68 patients had a calculable eFI. The 21% without a calculable eFI were more likely to be black or mixed race (p=0.038). The kappa score was -0.53 (p=0.99) indicating poor agreement of the two frailty scores (Table 1).

Conclusions : The sensor-based FE provided additional frailty scores in the 21% of patients without an eFI score. However, since a higher proportion were categorized as pre-frail/transitional by the sensor-based FE compared to eFI which categorized a higher proportion as frail, it is possible the FE might miss cases of frailty. This is concerning since non-white patients were also more likely to have inadequate historic EHR data to generate an eFI. Future studies should address whether other data captured at the point of care can be used to provide more accurate frailty estimates in those without adequate historic EHR data.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

 

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×