Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
Optimization of spot spacings for reducing roughness in laser induced optical breakdown processes for corneal laser vision correction
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Samuel Arba Mosquera
    Research & Development, SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions GmbH, Kleinostheim, Bavaria, Germany
  • Helen Amann
    Independent researcher, Germany
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Samuel Arba Mosquera SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions, Code E (Employment), SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions, Code P (Patent); Helen Amann None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 1043. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Samuel Arba Mosquera, Helen Amann; Optimization of spot spacings for reducing roughness in laser induced optical breakdown processes for corneal laser vision correction. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):1043.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Laser-based surgery gains importance and techniques in refractive surgery are improved. The femtosecond laser plays an important role in this field leading to fewer complications during and after surgery and a more precise cut. The aim of this work is to simulate an idealized/simplified cutting surface of such a system based on laser induced optical breakdown (LIOB).

Methods : The algorithm considers a possible trajectory of the laser pulses and calculates the roughness for different parameter settings (including LIOB threshold, pulse energies, and spot spacings). Certain critical points are considered (such as treatment dose) and the difference between achieved and ideal cut determines the roughness. Specific variables, such as spot distance (along the pathway), track distance (between lines/tracks) and pulse energy, are iteratively optimized.

Results : Analyses support the following findings for reducing roughness of the cut:
Tighter pulses (spacings) using constant pulse energies lead to lower roughness
Lower pulse energies for the same dose lead to lower roughness
Asymmetric settings with spot distance larger than track distance, for the same pulse energies and treatment dose, lead to lower roughness
Lower pulse energies are more important than asymmetric settings

Conclusions : Simulations suggest that lower pulse energies (well above LIOB threshold) combined with asymmetric spacings (spot-to-track distance ratio >>1) may be effective to lower the roughness of laser cuts generated by LIOB processes. Lower pulse energies (well above the threshold) emphasize the need for the LIOBTh to remain as low as possible. Reducing roughness by decreasing spacings (higher dose for same pulse energies) may have negative implications in visual recovery (risk for overdose). The optimized roughness is multiple times larger (rougher) than equivalent simulations for ablative procedures.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

 

Roughness is dependent on the amount of energy exceeding LIOBTh (E-Eth), and independent of the actual LIOBth (Bubble=K*(E-Eth)^(1/3)). Higher pulse energies (for the same treatment dose via larger spacings) increase roughness for both symmetric and asymmetric spacings

Roughness is dependent on the amount of energy exceeding LIOBTh (E-Eth), and independent of the actual LIOBth (Bubble=K*(E-Eth)^(1/3)). Higher pulse energies (for the same treatment dose via larger spacings) increase roughness for both symmetric and asymmetric spacings

 

Roughness is dependent on the asymmetry ratio (SpotDistance/TrackDistance). Higher asymmetry ratios (for the same pulse energies and treatment dose via larger spot distances with tigher track distances) reduce roughness

Roughness is dependent on the asymmetry ratio (SpotDistance/TrackDistance). Higher asymmetry ratios (for the same pulse energies and treatment dose via larger spot distances with tigher track distances) reduce roughness

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×