Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
EFFECT OF ORAL LAMIVUDINE VERSUS PLACEBO IN DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA: A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Felipe Pereira
    Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • Joseph Magagnoli
    Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • Meenakshi Ambati
    Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • Talita Fernandes de Oliveira
    Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • Juliana Angélica Estevão de Oliveira
    Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • Vinicius Oliveira Pequero
    Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • Lucas Zago Ribeiro
    Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • Dante Akira Kondo Kuroiwa
    Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • Fernando Korn Malerbi
    Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • Sergio Atala Dib
    Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • Nilva Bueno Moraes
    Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • Michel Eid Farah
    Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • Eduardo Buchele Rodrigues
    Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • Jayakrishna Ambati
    University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Felipe Pereira Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Code P (Patent); Joseph Magagnoli None; Meenakshi Ambati None; Talita Fernandes de Oliveira None; Juliana Angélica Estevão de Oliveira None; Vinicius Oliveira Pequero None; Lucas Zago Ribeiro None; Dante Akira Kondo Kuroiwa None; Fernando Malerbi None; Sergio Atala Dib None; Nilva Bueno Moraes None; Michel Eid Farah Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Code P (Patent); Eduardo Buchele Rodrigues Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Code P (Patent); Jayakrishna Ambati Abbvie/Allergan, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Janssen, Olix Pharmaceuticals, Retinal Solutions, Saksin LifeSciences, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), DiceRx, iVeena Holdings, iVeena Delivery Systems and Inflammasome Therapeutics, Code O (Owner), University of Virginia, Code P (Patent)
  • Footnotes
    Support  Latinofarma; University of Virginia Strategic Investment Fund (SIF 167)
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 4885. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Felipe Pereira, Joseph Magagnoli, Meenakshi Ambati, Talita Fernandes de Oliveira, Juliana Angélica Estevão de Oliveira, Vinicius Oliveira Pequero, Lucas Zago Ribeiro, Dante Akira Kondo Kuroiwa, Fernando Korn Malerbi, Sergio Atala Dib, Nilva Bueno Moraes, Michel Eid Farah, Eduardo Buchele Rodrigues, Jayakrishna Ambati; EFFECT OF ORAL LAMIVUDINE VERSUS PLACEBO IN DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA: A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):4885.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : The Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network (DRCR.net) Protocol T study demonstrated that monthly intravitreous injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents are effective in treating diabetic macular edema (DME) involving the center of the macula (center-involved DME [CI-DME]). These expensive and often burdensome injections also carry risks of vision-threatening complications. Whether an oral therapy that avoids these issues can improve visual acuity in DME is unknown. We sought to compare the efficacy of lamivudine, an orally administered inflammasome inhibitor, to oral placebo for improving visual acuity in patients with CI-DME and poor vision.

Methods : In this double-blind, randomized trial, we assigned 24 adults (mean age, 62.7±5.9 years) with diabetic macular edema involving the macular center and visual-acuity letter score less than 69 to receive oral lamivudine at a dose of 150 mg twice daily (10 participants; 16 eyes) or oral placebo (14 participants; 21 eyes). The study drugs were administered for 8 weeks. All participants were assigned to receive intravitreous bevacizumab at a dose of 1.25 mg at week 4. The primary outcome was the mean change in visual acuity. In addition, comparisons to aflibercept, bevacizumab, and ranibizumab were made using synthetic controls from the DRCR.net Protocol T study.

Results : From baseline to 4 weeks, mean visual-acuity letter score improved by 9.8 with lamivudine and decreased by 1.8 with placebo (P<0.001). At 8 weeks, the mean visual-acuity letter score improved by 16.9 with lamivudine and bevacizumab and by 5.3 with placebo and bevacizumab (P<0.001). Lamivudine was more effective at improving vision than bevacizumab or ranibizumab (P<0.05), and non-inferior to aflibercept (P=0.5). Only mild systemic adverse events were reported and were not significantly different between lamivudine and placebo groups.

Conclusions : Among patients with CI-DME and visual-acuity letter score less than 69, oral lamivudine improved vision.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

 

 

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×