Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
Feasibility and clinical efficacy of an OCT B-scan of interest tool
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Gary C Lee
    Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Dublin, California, United States
  • Hugang Ren
    Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Dublin, California, United States
  • Patricia Sha
    Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Dublin, California, United States
  • Sophia Yu
    Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Dublin, California, United States
  • Thomas Callan
    Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Dublin, California, United States
  • Katherine Talcott
    Center for Ophthalmic Bioinformatics, Cleveland Clinic Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
  • Rishi Singh
    Center for Ophthalmic Bioinformatics, Cleveland Clinic Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
    Cleveland Clinic Martin Hospitals, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Stuart, Florida, United States
  • Niranchana Manivannan
    Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Dublin, California, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Gary Lee Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Code E (Employment); Hugang Ren Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Code E (Employment); Patricia Sha Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Code E (Employment); Sophia Yu Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Code E (Employment); Thomas Callan Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Code E (Employment); Katherine Talcott Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Alimera, Apellis, Bausch and Lomb, Eyepoint, Genentech, Outlook, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Regeneron, Regenxbio, Code F (Financial Support), Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Genentech, Iveric Bio, Code R (Recipient); Rishi Singh Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Alcon, Allergan, Bausch and Lomb, Genentech, Regeneron, Apellis, Iveric, Code C (Consultant/Contractor); Niranchana Manivannan Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Code E (Employment)
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 4845. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Gary C Lee, Hugang Ren, Patricia Sha, Sophia Yu, Thomas Callan, Katherine Talcott, Rishi Singh, Niranchana Manivannan; Feasibility and clinical efficacy of an OCT B-scan of interest tool. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):4845.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : An OCT B-scan of interest (BSOI) tool was created using deep learning to highlight B-scans within an OCT volume scan which contain pathology (B-scan of interest) and B-scans of poor image quality (IQ) to improve workflow efficiency. While intrinsic test metrics, e.g. sensitivity and specificity, are valuable, predictive values (PVs) and likelihood ratios (LRs) may provide additional clinical utility. In this retrospective study, the diagnostic efficacy of the BSOI tool was evaluated.

Methods : The BSOI tool (ZEISS CIRRUS PathFinder) was previously trained using 76,544 B-scans from 598 macular cubes (512x128) acquired from 598 subjects with SD-OCT (CIRRUS™ HD-OCT 4000 and 5000, ZEISS, Dublin, CA) [1]. The BSOI tool first runs an IQ algorithm which flags B-scans with poor IQ, then flags good IQ scans “of interest” if one or more retinal pathology labels are found. Two hold-out test sets were used for validation: i) TestSet1: 25,600 B-scans (200 cubes, 200 subjects) acquired from CIRRUS 5000, labeled by at least 1 retina expert with specialist adjudication; ii) TestSet2: 28,800 B-scans (225 cubes, 225 subjects) acquired from CIRRUS® OCT 6000 (ZEISS, Dublin, CA), labeled by at least 2 optometrists.

Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive PV (PPV), negative PV (NPV), positive LR (LR+), and negative LR (LR-) were calculated from good IQ scans combined from both test sets (TestSet3). 95% confidence intervals were calculated via clustered bootstrapping.

Results : 53.9% of the B-scans in TestSet3 were of interest. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, study PPV, and study NPV for TestSet3 were 87.8%, 92.9%, 90.2%, 93.5%, and 86.7%, respectively (see Table 1). LR+ and LR- of 12.3 and 7.6 also suggest the tool provides a strong increase in the likelihood (or not) of pathology. Fig. 1 estimates PPV and NPV as functions of LRs and BSOI pre-test probabilities.

Conclusions : The study PPV and NPV indicate good utility in ruling in/out pathologies of interest for a given B-scan when the fraction of BSOI is high, which may be reflective of a retinal referral setting. Furthermore, in a typical healthy cohort where the BSOI prevalence is low (< ~5%) [2], Fig. 1 suggests NPV > 99% with a reasonable PPV up to ~39%. Overall, the PathFinder tool may provide additional guidance for a specific patient by helping clinicians take additional evidence into account.

[1] Talcott et al. IOC 2024; Article in Press.
[2] Yu et al. IOVS 2020; 61(9): PB0085.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

 

 

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×