Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
Influence of artificially elevating intraocular pressure on axial length in healthy adults
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Sayantan Biswas
    School of Optometry, Aston University, Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
  • Edward Mallen
    School of Optometry, Aston University, Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
    School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Bradford, Bradford, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom
  • Leon N Davies
    School of Optometry, Aston University, Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Sayantan Biswas None; Edward Mallen None; Leon Davies None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 4345. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Sayantan Biswas, Edward Mallen, Leon N Davies; Influence of artificially elevating intraocular pressure on axial length in healthy adults. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):4345.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To investigate the impact of artificially elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) on clinical measures of axial length (AL) and a range of ocular biometric measures in a cohort of healthy adults.

Methods : Twenty-eight eyes of fourteen young adult participants (7 myopes and 7 emmetropes, median age 20 (range, 18–22) years) had their blood pressure, height, weight, and ocular measurements (spherical equivalent refraction (SER), AL, IOP, central corneal thickness, corneal curvatures) recorded at sitting position. AL, IOP and corneal curvature measurements were repeated with participants inverted by 40° in the Trendelenburg position (TLP) for 2 min. A custom-built rig allowed the positioning of the IOLMaster perpendicular to the corneal surface, while IOP was measured with a hand-held Perkins tonometer. The change in ocular parameters (sitting versus inverted) were determined (mean ± SD) and their association with SER was analyzed using linear mixed model (LMM) fitted by restricted maximum likelihood with eyes nested within subjects as random intercept.

Results : TLP led to a significant increase in IOP (mean change, 10.9 ± 3.5 mmHg, P <0.001) and AL elongation (mean change, 26.0 ± 18.5 µm, P <0.001), but neither corneal steep (-0.08 ± 0.5 D) nor flat (0.03 ± 0.15 D) meridians. A significant positive association was found between the changes in IOP and AL (r = 0.577, P =0.001, Fig. 1). LMM adjusted for corneal curvature and thickness demonstrated a differential response in AL elongation of 2.91 µm (P =0.003), 4.22 µm (P < 0.001) and 0.51 µm (P =0.773) for every 1-mmHg rise in IOP for all, myopes (SER ≥-0.50 D) and emmetropes (SER <-0.50 D), respectively. Large IOP change (≥10 mmHg) remained to have a greater impact on the AL change for myopes (4.29 µm per mmHg, P =0.003) than in emmetropes (1.34 µm per mmHg, P =0.60) (Fig. 2).

Conclusions : IOP increase induced by TLP is associated with a small, but significant, AL elongation. An equivalent increase in IOP generated a greater increase of AL for myopic eyes compared to emmetropic eyes, especially with larger changes in IOP.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

 

Fig. 1. Change in AL as a function of the change in IOP. Difference in mean IOP plotted against the difference in mean AL from each participant’s sitting and inverted positions.

Fig. 1. Change in AL as a function of the change in IOP. Difference in mean IOP plotted against the difference in mean AL from each participant’s sitting and inverted positions.

 

Fig. 2. Distribution of AL change across SER and IOP groups. Wider sections (Kernel density) on the violin plot represent higher probability distribution of AL change.

Fig. 2. Distribution of AL change across SER and IOP groups. Wider sections (Kernel density) on the violin plot represent higher probability distribution of AL change.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×