Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
Comparison between CRISPR/Cas-based homology-dependent and homology-independent strategies for targeted gene editing of Bietti crystalline corneoretinal dystrophy
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Xiang Meng
    The third hospital, Peking University, Beijing, Beijing, China
  • Ruixuan Jia
    The third hospital, Peking University, Beijing, Beijing, China
  • Shicheng Yu
    The third hospital, Peking University, Beijing, Beijing, China
  • Xiaozhen Liu
    The third hospital, Peking University, Beijing, Beijing, China
  • Boling Xu
    The third hospital, Peking University, Beijing, Beijing, China
  • Liping Yang
    The third hospital, Peking University, Beijing, Beijing, China
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Xiang Meng None; Ruixuan Jia None; Shicheng Yu None; Xiaozhen Liu None; Boling Xu None; Liping Yang None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 2223. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Xiang Meng, Ruixuan Jia, Shicheng Yu, Xiaozhen Liu, Boling Xu, Liping Yang; Comparison between CRISPR/Cas-based homology-dependent and homology-independent strategies for targeted gene editing of Bietti crystalline corneoretinal dystrophy. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):2223.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : The CRISPR/Cas-based targeted transgene strategies are generally classified into homology-dependent and homology-independent approaches. In this article, we comprehensively compared the homology-mediated end joining (HMEJ) pathways based on homology-dependent strategy with homology-independent targeted integration (HITI) strategy. By rescuing the popular mutation of BCD, c.802-8_810del17insGC in vitro cells and in vivo retina, we explored the different application scenarios of HMEJ and HITI for inherited eye diseases.

Methods : The HMEJ method was taken by selected sgRNAs targeting on c.802-8_810del17insGC, following donor containing approximately 0.8 kb homologous arm, total 1.6kb sequences. The second HITI approach was taken by selected sgRNAs targeting intron 6 before the mutation and following inserted donor containing exon 7-11, approximately 1.5kb sequences. The comparison was taken in HEK 293T cells, BCD-iPSC-RPE cells using plasmid transfection in vitro. A humanized Cyp4v3 mouse containing mutation was also subretinal injected with two rAAV2/8 AAV vectors (1E9), one encoding CRISPR components and the other containing corresponding donor. Apart from editing efficiency, we also compared the morphology in rescued BCD-iPSC-RPE cells, ERG, fundus imaging, OCT and histologic analysis in mouse.

Results : The HMEJ strategy showed high editing efficient (29.14%±1.31%) in HEK 293T cells and produced normal morphology in edited BCD-iPSC-RPE cells. We also found no significant difference between one and two cutting sites (p=0.96). In mouse model at 9 months, however, we cannot detect the editing efficiency using Hi-TOM. ERG, fundus imaging and HE staining also performed as poor as untreated disease model. For HITI approach, it showed normal morphology in treated BCD-iPSC-RPE cells, high editing efficiency in both HEK 293T cells (33.5%±4.1%) and in vivo retina (25.3%±15.5%). In addition, the HITI-based editing restores visual function and retinal degeneration in mouse.

Conclusions : The results showed that HMEJ achieves efficient knock-in in HEK 293T cells and BCD-iPSC-RPE cells, however undetectable editing in BCD mouse retina. In contrast, HITI based method achieved precise and effective editing both in vitro and in vivo, suggesting it is considered to be a more promising therapeutic approach to manage inherited eye disorders.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

 

Fig.1 Schematic overview of HMEJ and HITI-based gene editing for BCD mutaiton

Fig.1 Schematic overview of HMEJ and HITI-based gene editing for BCD mutaiton

 

Comparisions of ERG and retinal morphology between different mouse groups

Comparisions of ERG and retinal morphology between different mouse groups

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×