Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
The Normal Distribution of Disc Area on a Combined UWF-SLO + SD-OCT device with Comparison to SD-OCT
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Ashley Speilburg
    Illinois Eye Institute, Illinois College of Optometry, Chicago, Illinois, United States
  • Patricia Salazar
    Illinois Eye Institute, Illinois College of Optometry, Chicago, Illinois, United States
  • Anne Rozwat
    Illinois Eye Institute, Illinois College of Optometry, Chicago, Illinois, United States
  • Lauren Turner
    Optos plc, Dunfermline, Fife, United Kingdom
  • Michael A Chaglasian
    Illinois Eye Institute, Illinois College of Optometry, Chicago, Illinois, United States
  • Michael Sinai
    Optos plc, Dunfermline, Fife, United Kingdom
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Ashley Speilburg Optos, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Topcon, Code C (Consultant/Contractor); Patricia Salazar Optos, Code C (Consultant/Contractor); Anne Rozwat Optos, Code C (Consultant/Contractor); Lauren Turner Optos, Code E (Employment); Michael Chaglasian Optos, Code C (Consultant/Contractor); Michael Sinai Optos, Code E (Employment)
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 4839. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Ashley Speilburg, Patricia Salazar, Anne Rozwat, Lauren Turner, Michael A Chaglasian, Michael Sinai; The Normal Distribution of Disc Area on a Combined UWF-SLO + SD-OCT device with Comparison to SD-OCT. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):4839.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To report the distribution of disc area measured with the Monaco, a combined ultra-widefield scanning laser ophthalmoscope (UWF-SLO) + spectral domain OCT (SD-OCT) in a large, mixed-race population of healthy eyes. Additionally, to compare the disc area measurement of 43 glaucomatous eyes imaged on both Cirrus and Monaco devices.

Methods : Optic disc scans were obtained from one randomly selected eye of 861 normal, healthy subjects using the Monaco device only and 43 glaucoma patients using both Monaco and Cirrus devices. Images were reviewed for quality. Scans with low signal strength or artifact affecting the disc measurement area were excluded. For the healthy eyes, we report the mean, standard deviation, and cut off points of 33% and 66% to characterize the values for ‘small’, ‘average’ and ‘large’ optic disc grouping. For the glaucomatous eyes, regression analysis and Bland Altman plots were used to determine the agreement of optic disc area measurements between devices.

Results : The mean disc area of normal eyes was 1.96 mm2 ± 0.41 (range = 1.2 to 3.1 mm2). Split evenly into thirds, the small group is < 1.77 mm2, the average group is 1.77 – 2.1 mm2, and the large group is > 2.1 mm2. There was a strong correlation between the optic disc area from the Monaco and Cirrus devices. The Pearson correlation coefficient was r = 0.97. The mean optic disc area for Monaco was 2.18 mm2 ± 0.44 and for the Cirrus it was 2.01 ± 0.40 mm2, with a mean difference of - 0.18.

Conclusions : Disc area measurements are highly correlated but differ between the Monaco and Cirrus devices by around 8%. Knowing the distribution of disc area for a particular device can aid in the clinical assessment of the optic nerve by considering the relative disc area and its effect on the neuroretinal rim and C/D ratios.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

 

Figure 1. Regression analysis comparing the Cirrus and Monaco disc area measurements shows very strong correlation with a Pearson correlation coefficient of r = 0.97.

Figure 1. Regression analysis comparing the Cirrus and Monaco disc area measurements shows very strong correlation with a Pearson correlation coefficient of r = 0.97.

 

Figure 2. Bland-Altman plot showing mean disc area differences between the Cirrus and Monaco devices. The plot shows agreement between the devices with a mean difference of -0.18 mm2.

Figure 2. Bland-Altman plot showing mean disc area differences between the Cirrus and Monaco devices. The plot shows agreement between the devices with a mean difference of -0.18 mm2.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×