Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
Comparing Aqueous Flow in Glaucoma Cases by Fluorophotometry Versus Pneumatonography
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Zoltan Namenyi
    Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
  • Carol B Toris
    Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
  • Alessandra C Derick
    Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
  • Alyson Kishi
    Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
  • Nadine Helmy
    Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
  • Shan Fan
    Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States
  • David M Reed
    Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
  • Arthur J Sit
    Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Mayo Clinic Minnesota, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
  • Arash Kazemi
    Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Mayo Clinic Minnesota, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
  • Vikas Gulati
    Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States
  • Sayoko E Moroi
    Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Zoltan Namenyi None; Carol Toris None; Alessandra Derick None; Alyson Kishi None; Nadine Helmy None; Shan Fan None; David Reed None; Arthur Sit None; Arash Kazemi None; Vikas Gulati None; Sayoko Moroi None
  • Footnotes
    Support  This work was funded by NEI EY022124 with additional support from the OSU Vision Sciences Research Core Program (OSU-VSRCP, P30EY032857), and New Chair Challenge Grant from Research to Prevent Blindness (OSU). REDCap support through The Ohio State University Center for Clinical and Translational Science (National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Grant Number UL1TR002733).
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 5144. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Zoltan Namenyi, Carol B Toris, Alessandra C Derick, Alyson Kishi, Nadine Helmy, Shan Fan, David M Reed, Arthur J Sit, Arash Kazemi, Vikas Gulati, Sayoko E Moroi; Comparing Aqueous Flow in Glaucoma Cases by Fluorophotometry Versus Pneumatonography. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):5144.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Aqueous flow (Fa) is a pharmacological target to reduce IOP and treat glaucoma. The current method of measurement is fluorophotometry (FaFl) which takes two or more hours to complete. A quicker method was proposed in 1950 by W. Morton Grant, who calculated Fa via a Schiøtz tonometer to collect steady state pressure (P0) and tonographic outflow facility (C). This method has not been applied to pneumatonography nor to eyes with glaucoma or ocular hypertension. We hypothesize that Fa calculated by Grant’s method (FaGr= CxP0) via pneumatonography will align with FaFl in patients under baseline and with timolol treatment.

Methods : Subjects with either ocular hypertension (OHT) or open-angle glaucoma (OAG) were enrolled in a multicenter, prospective, randomized crossover trial of latanoprost and timolol (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT04412096) as part of Eye Dynamics and Engineering Network 2 (EDEN2). FaFl was measured twice, at baseline and after one week treatment with timolol. At each visit, fluorophotometry, pneumatonography and tonometry were performed on the study eye. This yielded FaFl, C and P0, with FaGr = CxP0. FaGr values were first compared to each other, to observe effects of timolol, and then to FaFl values to determine any correlation. Values were analyzed using paired t-tests and Gardner-Altman plots.

Results : Preliminary results from 16 subjects (8 OHT, 8 OAG; 11 males, 5 females; 2 Asian, 4 African American, 10 White) ages 38-79 years (58 ± 11 years) are reported. Different sample sizes were analyzed based on quality of FaFl and FaGr. Timolol lowered FaFl significantly compared to baseline (paired mean difference= -1.17, P value= 0.0004, Fig. 1a). There was not a similar timolol treatment effect using FaGr calculation (paired mean difference= 0.543, P value= 0.464, Fig. 1b). FaGr and FaFl both at baseline were compared and are not similar (paired mean difference= -1.52, P value= 0.0164, Fig. 2).

Conclusions : In this preliminary finding, pneumatonography method is not an accurate tool to measure Fa compared to fluorophotometry nor to measure timolol induced changes in Fa. Further investigation and improvement of this outflow facility approach would enable assessment of aqueous flow in eyes that currently cannot be studied by fluorophotometry (e.g., eyes with uveitis, pseudophakia, or aphakia).

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

 

Fig. 1: Baseline and post-timolol for FaFl (a) and FaGr (b)

Fig. 1: Baseline and post-timolol for FaFl (a) and FaGr (b)

 

Fig. 2: Comparing baseline of FaGr and FaFl

Fig. 2: Comparing baseline of FaGr and FaFl

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×