Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
Testing the repeatability and reproducibility of glaucoma risk score models on spectral domain and swept source optical coherence tomography data
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Anya Guzman
    Topcon Healthcare, Oakland, New Jersey, United States
  • Mary K Durbin
    Topcon Healthcare, Oakland, New Jersey, United States
  • Yi Sing Hsiao
    Topcon Healthcare, Oakland, New Jersey, United States
  • Christopher Lee
    Topcon Healthcare, Oakland, New Jersey, United States
  • Tony H Ko
    Topcon Healthcare, Oakland, New Jersey, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Anya Guzman Topcon Healthcare, Code E (Employment); Mary Durbin Topcon Healthcare, Code E (Employment); Yi Sing Hsiao Topcon Healthcare, Code E (Employment); Christopher Lee Topcon Healthcare, Code E (Employment); Tony Ko Topcon Healthcare, Code E (Employment)
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 4838. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Anya Guzman, Mary K Durbin, Yi Sing Hsiao, Christopher Lee, Tony H Ko; Testing the repeatability and reproducibility of glaucoma risk score models on spectral domain and swept source optical coherence tomography data. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):4838.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of four glaucoma risk score models on spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and swept source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) 12mm by 9mm widefield OCT scans.

Methods : A cross-sectional study was conducted on 25 glaucoma and 23 healthy patients. All patients underwent an ocular examination to determine if they belonged in the healthy or glaucoma group. Each patient was scanned by a SS-OCT, Triton (Topcon Healthcare, Tokyo, Japan) and a SD-OCT, Maestro (Topcon Healthcare, Tokyo, Japan) with the same eye by three operators using 12 mm by 9 mm widefield OCT scans. Scans were excluded from the dataset for the following reasons: blinks, motion artifacts, a TopQ score less than 25, segmentation errors, or a mispositioned optic disc. All the OCT scans from both devices were used to generate risk scores using all four models developed by Fukai et al. (2022). Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) analyses were conducted on both groups to assess the repeatability and reproducibility of the models across two different devices and three operators.

Results : The mean risk scores for the healthy group ranged from 6 to 28, while the mean risk scores for the glaucoma group ranged from 73.8 to 87.5. The reproducibility limit values for the glaucoma group were 17 and higher for both devices. In contrast, the limit values for the healthy group were lower than those for the glaucoma group, indicating a relatively higher precision for the healthy group.

Conclusions : The mean values for the healthy group were consistent with the cut off specified in the Fukai paper, 0 to 89 for healthy eyes, whereas the mean risk scores for the glaucoma group were lower than the cutoff for glaucomatous eyes (90 to 100). The lower risk scores and high limit values for the glaucoma group may suggest the need to reconsider the threshold for identifying glaucoma when applying these models.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

 

Figure 1 shows the repeatability and reproducibility analysis for the healthy group.

Figure 1 shows the repeatability and reproducibility analysis for the healthy group.

 

Figure 2 shows the repeatability and reproducibility analysis for the glaucoma group.

Figure 2 shows the repeatability and reproducibility analysis for the glaucoma group.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×