Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
Investigating the Dynamic Behavior of Murine Pectinate Ligaments in Response to Intraocular Pressure Changes
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • babak safa
    Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
  • Nina Sara Fraticelli-Guzman
    Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
  • W Daniel Stamer
    Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States
  • Andrew J. Feola
    Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
    Atlanta VA Center for Visual & Neurocognitive Rehabilitation, Decatur, Georgia, United States
  • C Ross Ethier
    Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
    Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   babak safa None; Nina Sara Fraticelli-Guzman None; W Daniel Stamer None; Andrew Feola None; C Ross Ethier None
  • Footnotes
    Support  BrightFocus Foundation (G2021005F, BNS), NIH (K99EY035360 [BNS], P30EY006360, P30EY005722, R01EY031710 [CRE and WDS], Georgia Research Alliance (CRE)
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 2490. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      babak safa, Nina Sara Fraticelli-Guzman, W Daniel Stamer, Andrew J. Feola, C Ross Ethier; Investigating the Dynamic Behavior of Murine Pectinate Ligaments in Response to Intraocular Pressure Changes. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):2490.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Pectinate ligaments (PLs) are structural components of the aqueous outflow pathway in many species including mice, a common ocular hypertension model. However, the role of PLs in aqueous outflow and intraocular pressure (IOP) regulation is unclear. Recently, we investigated murine PL structure and steady-state mechanics using histomorphometry and finite element (FE) modeling [Safa+2023 and Li+2023, bioRxiv], which revealed PL structural development and increased stiffness with age, and their role in resisting Schlemm’s canal (SC) collapse by exerting tension on the trabecular meshwork (TM). However, the dynamic response of PLs to physiological changes in IOP (e.g., blinking, ocular pulse) are unknown. Here, we assessed the biomechanical response of PLs to a rapid change in IOP.

Methods : We treated murine PLs as a poroelastic (biphasic) material to evaluate their characteristic response time (τ), a measure of how long the effect of IOP perturbations persist. First, we estimated theoretically using τ~α2/Hak [Armstrong+1984, JBME], where α=178 μm is the relevant characteristic (SC) length [Safa+2023], Ha=0.22 kPa is the PL aggregate modulus [Li+2023], and k=1 mm4/N.s is the hydraulic permeability [Ethier+1986, IOVS]. Second, we used an FE model, solved in FEBio, to study the irideo-corneal angle in elderly mice (25-32 months) [Safa+2023] subject to an IOP increase: 5 mmHg above baseline linearly over 0.1 sec, followed by a hold (9.9 sec).

Results : The theoretical estimation resulted in τ~2.4 min. A rapid IOP change of 5 mmHg caused a significant fluid flux through the PLs, being initiated at the anterior edge of the PLs and propagating through the PLs while decreasing in magnitude over time, dissipating >95% within 5 sec.

Conclusions : Our calculations confirmed that murine PLs have a characteristic response time (5 sec ~ 2.4 min) that is physiologically relevant for IOP fluctuations. Thus, in addition to the PLs supporting the SC against collapse, they may exert transient biomechanical effects that moderate TM and PL deformations in response to IOP fluctuations, thereby helping to stabilize aqueous outflow.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

 

(A) Averaged fluid velocity magnitude (mm/s) in the PL region vs. time. Note that the IOP was increased for 0.1 sec and was held constant thereafter. The flux asymptotically decreased over 5 seconds. (B) Spatial patterns of fluid velocity in PL over time. Scale bar = 50 µm

(A) Averaged fluid velocity magnitude (mm/s) in the PL region vs. time. Note that the IOP was increased for 0.1 sec and was held constant thereafter. The flux asymptotically decreased over 5 seconds. (B) Spatial patterns of fluid velocity in PL over time. Scale bar = 50 µm

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×