Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
Impact of Different Literature-based High intraocular Pressure Failure Criteria on Success Rates of Glaucoma Surgery
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Alessandro Rabiolo
    Universita degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale Amedeo Avogadro, Novara, Piemonte, Italy
    Ophthalmology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Maggiore della Carita, Novara, Piemonte, Italy
  • Giacinto Triolo
    Ophthalmology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Lombardia, Italy
  • Andrea Servillo
    Ophthalmology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Maggiore della Carita, Novara, Piemonte, Italy
    Ophthalmology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milano, Italy
  • Anand Nitin
    Ophthalmology, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom
    Ophthalmology, Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Foundation Trust, Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom
  • Daniela Andrea Khaliliyeh Yarur
    Glaucoma, UCLA Jules Stein Eye Institute, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Sangwook Jin
    Glaucoma, UCLA Jules Stein Eye Institute, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Esteban Morales
    Glaucoma, UCLA Jules Stein Eye Institute, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Giovanni Montesano
    Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, London, United Kingdom
  • Gianni Virgili
    Universita degli Studi di Firenze, Firenze, Toscana, Italy
    IRCSS Fondazione G B Bietti per lo Studio e la Ricerca in Oftalmologia ONLUS, Roma, Italy
  • Joseph Caprioli
    Glaucoma, UCLA Jules Stein Eye Institute, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Stefano De Cillà
    Universita degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale Amedeo Avogadro, Novara, Piemonte, Italy
    Ophthalmology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Maggiore della Carita, Novara, Piemonte, Italy
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Alessandro Rabiolo None; Giacinto Triolo None; Andrea Servillo None; Anand Nitin None; Daniela Khaliliyeh Yarur None; Sangwook Jin None; Esteban Morales None; Giovanni Montesano Alcon Inc, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), CenterVue-Icare, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Omikron spa, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Relayer ltd, Code I (Personal Financial Interest); Gianni Virgili None; Joseph Caprioli None; Stefano De Cillà None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 3537. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Alessandro Rabiolo, Giacinto Triolo, Andrea Servillo, Anand Nitin, Daniela Andrea Khaliliyeh Yarur, Sangwook Jin, Esteban Morales, Giovanni Montesano, Gianni Virgili, Joseph Caprioli, Stefano De Cillà; Impact of Different Literature-based High intraocular Pressure Failure Criteria on Success Rates of Glaucoma Surgery. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):3537.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To evaluate the impact of different intraocular pressure (IOP) criteria on glaucoma surgery success rates in two large patient cohorts.

Methods : From a systematic review (Prospero ID: CRD42023460048), we identified 150 different high IOP criteria, including 46 variations of the 21-mmHg criterion. Of these, 45 were replicable and tested in this study. We applied the identified IOP definitions as failure criteria in two geographically distinct cohorts undergoing trabeculectomy at a US institution and deep sclerectomy (DS) at two UK hospitals. Additional failure criteria were: further IOP lowering surgery or ciliodestructive procedure, reoperation for hypotony complications, and loss of light perception. We calculated Kaplan-Meier surgical success rates, and tested differences in success rates as a function of IOP criterion with clustered Cox models with IOP>21 mmHg at any visit (the most used criterion) as a reference.

Results : 934 eyes (766 patients) and 1,765 eyes (1,385 patients) were included in the trabeculectomy and DS cohorts, respectively, with a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 41.4 (19.3-74.8) and 45.4 (20.9-79.8) months. Compared to the DS cohort, the trabeculectomy cohort was slightly older (74.4 vs 73.1 years, p=0.009), had lower preoperative median IOP (17.0 vs 22.0 mmHg, p<0.001), higher median number of glaucoma medications (3 vs 2, p<0.001), higher prevalence of preoperative systemic acetazolamide (10.9% vs 2.5%, p<0.001), non-white ethnicities (44% vs 4%, p<0.001), secondary glaucoma (22.3% vs 11.4%, p<0.001), and previous cataract (54.2% vs 13.8%, p<0.001), glaucoma (22.4% vs 7.3%, p<0.001), and retinal surgery (4.8% vs 1.8% p<0.001). Success rates greatly varied according to the IOP criterion chosen to define failure (Figure 1), ranging, at 5 years, between 8.7% and 74.0% for trabeculectomy and between 22.1% and 89.9% for DS. In comparison to IOP>21 mmHg at any visit (Figure 2), various IOP criteria led to different risks of failure, with hazard ratios ranging from 0.35 to 4.42 for trabeculectomy and from 0.22 to 3.88 for DS.

Conclusions : Our findings highlight the significant impact of varying high IOP criteria on glaucoma surgery success rates, underscoring the need for standardized failure criteria to enable consistent interpretation and comparison across studies. Long-term visual field rates may provide a more consistent primary outcome measure.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

 

 

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×