Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
Seasonal Variation in Myopia Control in The Bifocal Lenses in Nearsighted Kids (BLINK) Study
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Mora Boatman
    College of Optometry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
  • Jeffrey J Walline
    College of Optometry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
  • Mathew L Robich
    College of Optometry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
  • Lisa Jordan
    College of Optometry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
  • Catherine McDaniel
    Dayton Children's Hospital, Dayton, Ohio, United States
  • David A Berntsen
    College of Optometry, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, United States
  • Maria Walker
    College of Optometry, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, United States
  • Justina Raouf Assaad
    College of Optometry, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, United States
  • Elizabeth Day
    Athens Eye Care, Athens, Ohio, United States
  • Moriah A Chandler
    College of Optometry, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, United States
  • Kimberly J Shaw
    College of Optometry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
  • Jill A Myers
    College of Optometry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
  • Donald O Mutti
    College of Optometry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Mora Boatman None; Jeffrey Walline Myoptech, Code C (Consultant/Contractor); Mathew Robich None; Lisa Jordan None; Catherine McDaniel None; David Berntsen None; Maria Walker None; Justina Assaad None; Elizabeth Day None; Moriah Chandler None; Kimberly Shaw None; Jill Myers None; Donald Mutti Vyluma, Code C (Consultant/Contractor)
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIH U10 EY023204, 023206, 023208, 023210, P30 EY007551, and UL1 TR002733; Bausch + Lomb
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 165. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Mora Boatman, Jeffrey J Walline, Mathew L Robich, Lisa Jordan, Catherine McDaniel, David A Berntsen, Maria Walker, Justina Raouf Assaad, Elizabeth Day, Moriah A Chandler, Kimberly J Shaw, Jill A Myers, Donald O Mutti; Seasonal Variation in Myopia Control in The Bifocal Lenses in Nearsighted Kids (BLINK) Study. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):165.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Studies have shown there is a slower rate of myopia progression in the summer compared to the winter. The purpose of this analysis is to determine if there is seasonal variation in myopia control.

Methods : In the BLINK Study, 294 children ages 7-11 years old with baseline spherical myopia between -0.75 D and -5.00 D and with <1.00 D astigmatism were randomly assigned to single vision (SV), +1.50 (medium) add, or +2.50 (high) add center-distance soft multifocal contact lenses. Participants had to attend all 6 follow-up visits within ±35 days of target visit date. Myopia progression was the change in non-cycloplegic spherical equivalent autorefraction between 2 6-month visits. Semi-annual myopia progression was calculated using the COMET Study formula: (myopia progression / number of days between two visits) x 182.5. The midpoint date between 2 visits defined seasons. Summer = April-September and winter = October-March. Myopia control was the difference in progression rate between SV and medium add and between SV and high add multifocal contact lens wearers. The 3-year average semi-annual myopia progression and myopia control rates were compared by season.

Results : 223 participants met the inclusion criteria for this analysis. There were no significant differences between included and excluded participants for age at baseline, % sex, and baseline myopia (all p>0.05). The average semi-annual myopia progression rate over 3 years was -0.11±0.22D in the summer (S) and -0.23±0.19D in the winter (W, p=0.002) for SV, -0.10 ± 0.24D (S) and -0.21 ± 0.22D (W, p=0.005) for medium add, and +0.01 ± 0.22D (S) and -0.20 ± 0.21D (W, p=<0.001) for high add. The figure shows the average semi-annual myopia control rate between SV and medium add was +0.01 ± 0.23D in summer (p=0.84) and +0.02 ± 0.20D in winter (p=0.50), and between SV and high add was +0.12±0.22D in summer (p=0.002) and +0.03±0.20D in winter (p=0.34).

Conclusions : As expected from previous studies, myopia progresses faster in the winter than summer for all three groups, but myopia control with a high add was only meaningful in the summer.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

 

Figure. The myopia control rate (difference in average semi-annual progression rate between the multifocal groups and single vision (SV) control group), where positive myopia control means the progression is faster for the SV group than the multifocal (+1.50 [medium] or +2.50 [high] add) groups, by season.

Figure. The myopia control rate (difference in average semi-annual progression rate between the multifocal groups and single vision (SV) control group), where positive myopia control means the progression is faster for the SV group than the multifocal (+1.50 [medium] or +2.50 [high] add) groups, by season.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×