Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
Cone Identification on Merged Non-Confocal Quadrant-Detection Adaptive Optics Scanning Light Ophthalmoscopy (AOSLO) Images
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Toco Yuen Ping Chui
    Ophthalmology, New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States
    Ophthalmology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States
  • Luis Muncharaz Duran
    Ophthalmology, New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States
  • Affan Haq
    Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States
  • Justin V Migacz
    Ophthalmology, New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States
  • Oscar Otero
    Ophthalmology, New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States
  • Alfredo Dubra
    Ophthalmology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States
  • Richard B Rosen
    Ophthalmology, New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States
    Ophthalmology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Toco Chui None; Luis Muncharaz Duran None; Affan Haq None; Justin Migacz None; Oscar Otero None; Alfredo Dubra None; Richard Rosen Visionix (OptoVue), Boehringer-Ingelheim, Regeneron, CellView, Lumithera, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Visionix (OptoVue), CellView, Ocusciences, Topcon, Canon, Code F (Financial Support), Visionix (OptoVue), Guardion, CellView, Opticology, Code I (Personal Financial Interest), Visionix (OptoVue), Code P (Patent)
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIH Grants R01EY027301, R01HL159116, R01EY031360, R01EY032147, and R01EY032669. Marrus Family Foundation, Challenge Grant award from Research to Prevent Blindness, and the New York Eye & Ear Foundation.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 3403. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Toco Yuen Ping Chui, Luis Muncharaz Duran, Affan Haq, Justin V Migacz, Oscar Otero, Alfredo Dubra, Richard B Rosen; Cone Identification on Merged Non-Confocal Quadrant-Detection Adaptive Optics Scanning Light Ophthalmoscopy (AOSLO) Images. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):3403.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Cone photoreceptor inner segments in non-confocal split-detection AOSLO images appear as a bubble wrap-like mosaic in which each cell has bright and dark opposite edges, complicating algorithms for automated cell identification. Here we demonstrate that the merging of non-confocal quadrant-detection images allows cone identification in normal and pathologic eyes using algorithms with minimal complexity.

Methods : Confocal and non-confocal quadrant-detection images were collected simultaneously in 6 controls (7 eyes) and 7 patients (8 eyes) with retinal pathology (PMID: 33680539). To remove non-homogenous intensity and optimize edge contrast of photoreceptors, a merged non-confocal quadrant-detection image was generated by combining 4 emboss-filtered split-detection images (0, 45, 90, & 135°) (PMID: 36531581). Automated parafoveal cone identifications on the confocal image at retinal eccentricity 120-570µm using ImageJ TrackMate (PMID: 35654950) were treated as ground truth. Validation of cone identification accuracy of the merged quadrant-detection image processed with different kernel sizes (3×3, 5x5, and 7x7 pixels) were compared to the ground truth (Figure). Semi-automated cone identification on merged quadrant-detection images at retinal eccentricity 300-3200µm was also performed in pathologic eyes. True positive rate, false positive rate, and Dice’s coefficient were computed as described previously (Dice, 1945).

Results : Dice’s coefficient of automated parafoveal cone identification was 0.953±0.019 (range: 0.904-0.983). Statistically significant differences were observed in 3x3 vs 7x7 and 5x5 vs 7x7 kernel sizes using Friedman test (post-hoc, p<0.001 & p=0.014, respectively). No statistical difference was found in 3x3 vs 5x5 kernel sizes (post-hoc, p=0.68). Evaluation of semi-automated cone identifications on merged quadrant-detection images in pathologic eyes processed using 5x5 kernel size showed a Dice’s coefficient of 0.964±0.019 (range: 0.847-0.998).

Conclusions : We demonstrated high accuracy of cone identification on merged non-confocal quadrant-detection images at retinal eccentricity of 120-3200µm in control and pathologic eyes using ImageJ Trackmate.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

 

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×