Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
Forecasting glaucoma from multimodal data using deep learning models
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Xiaoqin Huang
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, United States
  • Asma Poursoroush
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, United States
  • Yeganeh Madadi
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, United States
  • Hina Raja
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, United States
  • Mohammad Delsoz
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, United States
  • Louis R. Pasquale
    Department of Ophthalmology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States
  • Michael V. Boland
    Department of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
  • Chris A Johnson
    Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, United States
  • Nazlee Zebardast
    Department of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
  • Siamak Yousefi
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, United States
    Department of Genetics, Genomics, and Informatics, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Xiaoqin Huang None; Asma Poursoroush None; Yeganeh Madadi None; Hina Raja None; Mohammad Delsoz None; Louis Pasquale None; Michael Boland Carl Zeiss Meditec,Topcon Healthcare, Allergan, Janssen, Code C (Consultant/Contractor); Chris Johnson None; Nazlee Zebardast None; Siamak Yousefi Enolink, M&S Technologies, Remidio, InsightAEye, Code R (Recipient)
  • Footnotes
    Support  EY030142
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 374. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Xiaoqin Huang, Asma Poursoroush, Yeganeh Madadi, Hina Raja, Mohammad Delsoz, Louis R. Pasquale, Michael V. Boland, Chris A Johnson, Nazlee Zebardast, Siamak Yousefi; Forecasting glaucoma from multimodal data using deep learning models. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):374.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To assess the applicability of deep learning (DL) models to forecast glaucoma development based on multiple data modalities.

Methods : We developed a DL model to forecast glaucoma development from 3271 eyes of 1636 patients who participated in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study. The input data consisted of various combinations of fundus photographs, visual fields (VFs), clinical factors (such as intraocular pressure, central corneal thickness, and cup-to-disc ratio), and demographics (age, gender, race) from the baseline visit. We investigated the model based on FVCD (fundus + VF + clinical + demographic), FV (fundus + VF), FCD (fundus + clinical + demographic), VCD (VF + clinical + demographic), F (fundus), V (VF), and CD (clinical + demographic). Fundus features were extracted by a VGG19 architecture while VF and other input data were scaled and then concatenated before feeding to the multilayer perceptron (MLP) classifier (Fig.1). The models for single modality data were either a VGG19 (F modal) or artificial neural network (ANN) (V and CD modal). We evaluated the models by computing accuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and weighted F1 score.

Results : On average, eyes developed glaucoma after 7.5 years. The FVCD and FCD model achieved the highest and comparable performance with AUC, accuracy and weighted F1 score of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.84-0.89), 79% (75-81%), 0.81 (0.79-0.83) in FVCD, and 0.86 (0.82-0.90), 78% (73-82%), 0.81 (0.77-0.84) in FCD, respectively. While the AUC and weighted F1 score in the other models were as follows: F-0.74 (0.68-0.79), 0.69 (0.66-0.73); V-0.68 (0.65-0.71), 0.69 (0.66-0.71); CD-0.77 (0.72-0.81), 0.74 (0.71-0.78); FV-0.81(0.78-0.84), 0.77 (0.75, 0.79), VCD-0.68 (0.61-0.74), 0.68 (0.64-0.73). The performance of FVCD and FCD was significantly higher than the other models (p<0.05 in AUC and weighted F1 score) (Fig.2).

Conclusions : The model integrating information from fundus, clinical and demographic factors provided a highly promising outcome for forecasting glaucoma from the baseline visit. This approach may prove useful for predicting glaucoma development in glaucoma research and clinical practice.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

 

Figure 1. Flowchart of the multimodal model. MLP: multilayer perceptron.

Figure 1. Flowchart of the multimodal model. MLP: multilayer perceptron.

 

Figure 2. Performance comparison of models based on single and multimodality data. F-fundus, V-visual field, CD-clinical factor and demographics, FV-F+V, FCD-F+CD, VCD-V+CD, FVCD-F+V+CD.

Figure 2. Performance comparison of models based on single and multimodality data. F-fundus, V-visual field, CD-clinical factor and demographics, FV-F+V, FCD-F+CD, VCD-V+CD, FVCD-F+V+CD.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×