Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
Validation of polygenic risk score in age-related macular degeneration prognosis: a pilot study
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Yiu Wai Chan
    Moorfields Reading Centre and Clinical AI Lab, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, London, United Kingdom
  • Timing Liu
    Moorfields Reading Centre and Clinical AI Lab, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, London, United Kingdom
    NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, United Kingdom
  • Ismail Moghul
    Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Moorfields Reading Centre and Clinical AI Lab, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, London, United Kingdom
  • Siegfried Wagner
    Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Moorfields Reading Centre and Clinical AI Lab, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, London, United Kingdom
  • Dun Jack Fu
    Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Moorfields Reading Centre and Clinical AI Lab, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, London, United Kingdom
  • Alan Sousa da Silva
    Moorfields Reading Centre and Clinical AI Lab, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, London, United Kingdom
    NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, United Kingdom
  • Gongyu Zhang
    Moorfields Reading Centre and Clinical AI Lab, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, London, United Kingdom
    NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, United Kingdom
  • Gunjan Naik
    Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Moorfields Reading Centre and Clinical AI Lab, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, London, United Kingdom
  • Pallavi Bagga
    Moorfields Reading Centre and Clinical AI Lab, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, London, United Kingdom
    NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, United Kingdom
  • Sophie Glinton
    Moorfields Reading Centre and Clinical AI Lab, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, London, United Kingdom
    NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, United Kingdom
  • Sobha Sivaprasad
    NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, United Kingdom
  • Anthony P Khawaja
    NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, United Kingdom
  • Praveen J Patel
    NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, United Kingdom
  • Pearse Andrew Keane
    NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, United Kingdom
  • Nikolas Pontikos
    Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Moorfields Reading Centre and Clinical AI Lab, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, London, United Kingdom
  • Konstantinos Balaskas
    Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Moorfields Reading Centre and Clinical AI Lab, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, London, United Kingdom
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Yiu Wai Chan None; Timing Liu None; Ismail Moghul None; Siegfried Wagner None; Dun Jack Fu None; Alan Sousa da Silva None; Gongyu Zhang None; Gunjan Naik None; Pallavi Bagga None; Sophie Glinton None; Sobha Sivaprasad None; Anthony Khawaja None; Praveen Patel None; Pearse Keane None; Nikolas Pontikos None; Konstantinos Balaskas None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 5648. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Yiu Wai Chan, Timing Liu, Ismail Moghul, Siegfried Wagner, Dun Jack Fu, Alan Sousa da Silva, Gongyu Zhang, Gunjan Naik, Pallavi Bagga, Sophie Glinton, Sobha Sivaprasad, Anthony P Khawaja, Praveen J Patel, Pearse Andrew Keane, Nikolas Pontikos, Konstantinos Balaskas; Validation of polygenic risk score in age-related macular degeneration prognosis: a pilot study. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):5648.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a major cause of blindness, necessitating improved prognosis and personalized treatment strategies. This study aimed to investigate the potential of combining genetic analysis with imaging techniques to develop more accurate and effective predictors for AMD outcomes.

Methods : A total of 118 patients were recruited voluntarily at Moorfields Eye Hospital. Their genotype, demographics and Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) B-scans were collected to establish the dataset for the study. A polygenic risk score (PRS) was derived from 157 variants. The associations of PRS with age, treatment interval and tissue volume were analyzed statistically with linear regression. To explore the effect of multimodal integration with imaging data, the model was extended with imaging features extracted from passing OCT B-scans into LeNet-5 model in treatment burden classification and into NEO model in dry retina classification. In order to fuse multimodal information, imaging features were concatenated with PRS variants at the final fully connected layer of LeNet-5 model, while XGBoost was employed to take NEO imaging features and PRS as features for prediction. The extended multimodal models as well as their unimodal counterparts were trained and evaluated using the dataset with 10-fold cross validation. Their performance was compared in terms of accuracy and AUC ROC score.

Results : The study found significant associations between PRS and clinical parameters such as age, treatment burden and retina fluid volume (Table 1), though the one with treatment burden lost significance after controlling for age. Moreover, predictive models using both PRS and imaging features showed higher accuracy and AUC ROC score (Table 2). This indicated the effectiveness and predictive power of PRS when used alone or in a multimodal setting, where imaging features demonstrated a complementary effect with PRS.

Conclusions : The integration of genetic information with multimodal imaging techniques in AMD research offers promise for improved prognosis of the disease. This study highlights the significance of genetic factors in AMD development and progression and supports the potential for personalized medicine approaches.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

 

Table 1. Associations between PRS and clinical parameters.

Table 1. Associations between PRS and clinical parameters.

 

Table 2. Performance of models with PRS only, imaging features only and both as model features.

Table 2. Performance of models with PRS only, imaging features only and both as model features.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×