Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
Patterns of macular ganglion cell layer damage in neuro-ophthalmic disease assessed with optical coherence tomography
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Mi Jeung Kim
    Ophthalmology, Hangil Eye Hospital, Incheon, Incheon, Korea (the Republic of)
    Ophthalmology, Catholic Kwandong University College of Medicine, Gangneung, Gangwon-do, Korea (the Republic of)
  • Emmanouil Tsamis
    Ophthalmology, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States
  • Ari Leshno
    Ophthalmology, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States
    Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Tel Aviv, Israel
  • Jeffrey Odel
    Ophthalmology, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States
  • Donald C Hood
    Ophthalmology, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States
    Psychology, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Mi Jeung Kim None; Emmanouil Tsamis Envision Health Technologies Inc., Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Topcon Inc., Code F (Financial Support); Ari Leshno None; Jeffrey Odel None; Donald Hood Novartis, Code F (Financial Support), Heidelberg Eng., Code F (Financial Support), Topcon Inc., Code F (Financial Support), Heidelberg Eng., Code R (Recipient), Topcon Inc. , Code R (Recipient)
  • Footnotes
    Support  Emmanouil Tsamis; K99 EY032182
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 5510. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Mi Jeung Kim, Emmanouil Tsamis, Ari Leshno, Jeffrey Odel, Donald C Hood; Patterns of macular ganglion cell layer damage in neuro-ophthalmic disease assessed with optical coherence tomography. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):5510.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To compare the patten of macular ganglion cell layer (GCL) damage seen with optical coherence tomography (OCT) in eyes with non-glaucomatous optic neuropathy to a model of damage due to glaucoma.[1]

Methods : Forty-two eyes from 26 patients diagnosed with non-glaucomatous optic neuropathy and with macular GCL damage on the GCL thickness map from Spectralis (Heidelberg Engineering) OCT reports (Fig. 1A) were selected from a larger group referred by a neuro-ophthalmolgist. The pattern of the GCL damage was compared to a model [1] of glaucoma progression of the thick donut shaped region of the GCL around the fovea seen in healthy eyes (Fig. 1A, left). According to the model, glaucomatous damage to this donut starts in the temporal sectors and progresses towards the nasal sectors, and thus results in characteristic patterns. The patterns of macular GCL in the 42 eyes were categorized as: “Consistent” with the model; “Uniform” damage, so the model does not apply; and “Inconsistent” with the model. The referring neuro-ophthalmologist classified the etiology of the disease of each eye based upon all available information.

Results : The damage in 21 (50%) of the eyes was consistent with the model, while the model did not apply in 16 (38%) eyes involving the entire macula GCL sector. The remaining 5 (12%) showed patterns of GCL damage inconsistent with the model of glaucoma. Table 1 shows the analysis based on disease etiology. All 5 inconsistent eyes, including the 4 eyes with ischemic optic neuropathy (ION) and one eye with optic neuritis, had more severe damage in the nasal sectors of the macula than the more temporal sectors. Fig. 1 contains the GCL map of one of the 4 ION eyes (C) and the one optic neuritis eye (D). This pattern is relatively rare in eyes with glaucoma.[1]

Conclusions : Non-glaucomatous optic neuropathy presents diverse morphological patterns of macular GCL defects. Glaucoma specialists confronted with eyes with relatively more nasal GCL damage should rule out other causes such as ION or optic neuritis. On the other hand, ION patients can also present with a pattern consistent with the model. Thus, agreement with the model does not distinguish ION from glaucoma.
[1] Hood DC, et al. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2023

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

 

 

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×