Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
Assessment of the Reliability of Pupillometer Measurements Obtained from a Virtual Reality Headset: A Control Subject Analysis
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Georgeana Mijares
    Artificial Intelligence and Computer Augmented Vision Laboratory, University of Miami Health System Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, Florida, United States
  • Gustavo Gameiro
    Artificial Intelligence and Computer Augmented Vision Laboratory, University of Miami Health System Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, Florida, United States
  • Maria Matosas
    Artificial Intelligence and Computer Augmented Vision Laboratory, University of Miami Health System Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, Florida, United States
  • Esdras A Arrieta
    Artificial Intelligence and Computer Augmented Vision Laboratory, University of Miami Health System Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, Florida, United States
  • Rashed Kashem
    HERU Inc., Miami, Florida, United States
  • Mohamed Abou Shousha
    Artificial Intelligence and Computer Augmented Vision Laboratory, University of Miami Health System Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, Florida, United States
    HERU Inc., Miami, Florida, United States
  • Richard Parrish
    Artificial Intelligence and Computer Augmented Vision Laboratory, University of Miami Health System Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, Florida, United States
    HERU Inc., Miami, Florida, United States
  • John McSoley
    Artificial Intelligence and Computer Augmented Vision Laboratory, University of Miami Health System Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, Florida, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Georgeana Mijares None; Gustavo Gameiro None; Maria Matosas None; Esdras Arrieta None; Rashed Kashem HERU Inc., Code E (Employment); Mohamed Abou Shousha HERU Inc., Code E (Employment); Richard Parrish HERU Inc., Code I (Personal Financial Interest); John McSoley None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 5491. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Georgeana Mijares, Gustavo Gameiro, Maria Matosas, Esdras A Arrieta, Rashed Kashem, Mohamed Abou Shousha, Richard Parrish, John McSoley; Assessment of the Reliability of Pupillometer Measurements Obtained from a Virtual Reality Headset: A Control Subject Analysis. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):5491.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To evaluate the reliability of pupillometer measurements obtained from a novel software application incorporated into a commercially available virtual reality (VR) headset.

Methods : A total of 25 control subjects participated in the study (13 females, 12 males, 18-58 age range). Each subject was assessed using Heru Prime (Heru, Inc., Miami, FL) software application installed on a wearable virtual reality head mounted device (Pico Neo 3 Pro Eye, ByteDance, Beijing, China), equipped with infrared eye tracking hardware. Pupillometer measurements were performed on three separate occasions within a single day. During these measurements, we recorded pupil size in dim and bright light, pupil size before and after accommodation, and velocity of pupillary constriction. The data obtained was then analyzed using Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), Cronbach’s alpha, Standard Deviation of the Residues (SD Residues) and the Coefficient of Variance (CoV) to assess the repeatability of the measurements.

Results : Out of the 25 control subjects, 24 completed all three tests. High repeatability was noted for pupil size in dim (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.987, ICC = 0.981, 95% CI: 0.959-0.991) and bright light (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.985, ICC = 0.973, 95% CI: 0.909-0.988) with SD Residues at 0.111 mm and 0.108 mm, and CoV of 4.169% and 5.334% respectively. Moderate repeatability was observed for reactive velocity (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.716, ICC = 0.717, 95% CI: 0.544-0.832), with a SD Residues at 0.324 mm/s and CoV of 19.407%. Accommodation showed good consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.837, ICC = 0.829, 95% CI: 0.724-0.898), with a SD Residues at 0.141 mm and CoV of 17.885%. Pupillary reactivity was categorized into three groups based on constriction velocity: non-reactive (velocity < 0.4 mm/s), sluggish (0.4 mm/s ≤ velocity < 0.8 mm/s), and brisk (velocity ≥ 0.8 mm/s). The measured repeatability among these categories was 100%.

Conclusions :
The preliminary results indicate that a pupillometer based on a wearable VR device can provide consistent and reproducible pupillometry results, demonstrating its potential as a reliable tool for pupillary assessment.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

 

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×