Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
Predicting loss and delay to follow-up of amblyopia patients
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Alexandra Salem
    Department of Medical Informatics and Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
  • Elizabeth White
    Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
  • Wei-Chun Lin
    Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
  • Andrea Tham
    Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
  • Kellyn Bellsmith
    Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
  • Annie Kuo
    Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
  • Jamie Anderson
    Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
  • Allison Summers
    Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
  • Leah Reznick
    Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
  • Michelle Hribar
    Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
    Department of Medical Informatics and Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Alexandra Salem None; Elizabeth White None; Wei-Chun Lin None; Andrea Tham None; Kellyn Bellsmith None; Annie Kuo None; Jamie Anderson None; Allison Summers None; Leah Reznick None; Michelle Hribar None
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIH T15LM007088, NIH R01 LM013426, and unrestricted departmental funding from Research to Prevent Blindness
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 5195. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Alexandra Salem, Elizabeth White, Wei-Chun Lin, Andrea Tham, Kellyn Bellsmith, Annie Kuo, Jamie Anderson, Allison Summers, Leah Reznick, Michelle Hribar; Predicting loss and delay to follow-up of amblyopia patients. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):5195.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Amblyopia can lead to irreversible loss of vision without timely monitoring and treatment. Previous work found associations between social determinants of health (SDoH) and amblyopia follow-up, and predicted general pediatric no-show risk. We extended the work to predict amblyopia patients at risk of delay or loss to follow-up.

Methods : Data consisted of newly diagnosed amblyopia patients seen at Casey Eye Institute in 2021 and 2022 with a recommended follow-up time of <6 months after the initial visit. The amblyopia status and follow-up recommendation were automatically identified using natural language processing methods on visit notes. We implemented a logistic regression model to predict whether a patient completed their first follow-up within 2 months of suggested date (predictors in Table 1b). We did a 90/10 train/test split (770/85 patients). We calculated odds-ratios and p-values (with Bonferroni correction for age) based on the Wald test for each predictor. We calculated accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC (area under the curve) of the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve for the model on the test data.

Results : There were 855 patients in the cohort (446/409 yes/no follow up in 2 months); demographics are in Table 1a and predictors’ odds ratios and p values are in 1b. Commercial insurance was associated with higher odds of completing the follow-up without delay (p<0.001). Having at least one cancellation and English as preferred language were associated with lower odds of completing the follow-up without delay (p<0.001, p=0.03). Age <1 year had higher odds of completing the follow-up without delay as compared to age >5 years (p=0.01), but a Wald test of the effect of age overall was non-significant (p=0.06). Other predictors were non-significant. On test data, we achieved 70.6% accuracy, with 76.7% sensitivity and 64.3% specificity. Our AUC was 73.1% (CI: 61.9%-84.2%). The ROC curve is in Figure 1.

Conclusions : Our results are consistent with previous accuracy of no-show risk. Our significant predictors—English preferred, commercial insurance, having a cancellation—are all related to patient level SDoH. The community level SDoH predictor (ADI) was not, indicating a need to explore additional patient-level predictors. This model is a first attempt at the important aim of identifying amblyopia patients at risk of delayed care or loss to follow-up, in order to develop interventions and prevent vision loss.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

 

 

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×