Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
Accuracy of IOP Delivery in Brown Norway Rats Following Awake Controlled Elevation of IOP
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • John C Morrison
    Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
  • William O Cepurna
    Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
  • Elaine C. Johnson
    Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
  • Diana C Lozano
    Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   John Morrison None; William Cepurna None; Elaine Johnson None; Diana Lozano None
  • Footnotes
    Support  This study was supported by NIH/NEI grants R01 EY010145 (JCM), R01 EY010145-17S1 (DCL), P30 EY010572 (OHSU), the Malcolm M. Marquis, MD Endowed Fund for Innovation, and by unrestricted departmental funding from Research to Prevent Blindness (New York, NY).
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 4077. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      John C Morrison, William O Cepurna, Elaine C. Johnson, Diana C Lozano; Accuracy of IOP Delivery in Brown Norway Rats Following Awake Controlled Elevation of IOP. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):4077.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To determine the accuracy of elevating IOP by infusing balanced salt solution (BSS) via a Pinport and intraocular microcannula.

Methods : Brown Norway rats with a head-mounted Pinport leading to an implanted microcannula were connected via a tether to an elevated BSS-containing reservoir and transducer. Animals underwent one or more exposures to awake Controlled Elevation of IOP (aCEI), during which IOP was increased to 45 mmHg for 7 hours with free mobility and access to food and water. Approximately one week after the final aCEI, IOP produced by BSS through the Pinport was directly measured in animal subgroups using a second cannula, placed in the anterior chamber (AC). Intended Pinport pressures were compared to AC cannula and Tonolab pressures.

Results : In 12 animals (Group 1), AC cannula pressures were within 5 mmHg of the intended Pinport pressure at every IOP level. (Figure) Mean Pinport pressures were not significantly different from the AC cannula (P=0.53) or TonoLab measurements (P=0.48). However, Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement between the Pinport and AC cannula measurements (2±2 mmHg), were tighter than between Pinport and Tonolab (-1±8 mmHg). AC cannulations in these animals occurred an average of 20 ± 11 (SD) days following Pinport/cannula implantation and 9 ± 2 (SD) days after the final aCEI.
Eight other animals (Group 2), assessed an average of 14 ± 5 (SD) days after the Pinport/cannula implantation and 8 ± 4 (SD) days following final aCEI, showed that AC cannula pressures were more than 5 mmHg below intended Pinport pressures at every level. As an indicator of reliability, Group 1 Tonolab readings at a Pinport pressure of 40 mmHg ranged from 30 – 57 mmHg (mean 41 ± 9 ), while group 2 ranged from 8 – 26 mmHg (mean 19 ± 9).

Conclusions : Pinport/microcannula implanted eyes can retain good delivery of IOP following awake CEI.
Tonolab response to an initial Pinport pressure of 40 mmHg can identify eyes in which the AC pressure will closely match the intended Pinport IOP.
This system is suitable for studying repeat exposures to known levels of IOP in Brown Norway rats.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

 

Group 1 IOP response in 12 Pinport-implanted Brown Norway rats. (Left) AC cannula (red line) pressures show excellent agreement with intended pressures delivered by Pinport (black line). (Right) Comparison of mean pressure measurements by Pinport (circles), AC cannula (triangles), and Tonolab (squares).

Group 1 IOP response in 12 Pinport-implanted Brown Norway rats. (Left) AC cannula (red line) pressures show excellent agreement with intended pressures delivered by Pinport (black line). (Right) Comparison of mean pressure measurements by Pinport (circles), AC cannula (triangles), and Tonolab (squares).

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×