Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
Comparative outcomes of phacoemulsification combined with Ab interno trabecular excision: SIONTM versus Kahook Dual Blade® (KDB®)
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • David Sola-Del Valle
    Glaucoma, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
  • Henisk Falah
    Glaucoma, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
  • Jonathan Trzcinski
    Glaucoma, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
  • Hani El Helwe
    Glaucoma, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   David Sola-Del Valle None; Henisk Falah None; Jonathan Trzcinski None; Hani El Helwe None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 3476. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      David Sola-Del Valle, Henisk Falah, Jonathan Trzcinski, Hani El Helwe; Comparative outcomes of phacoemulsification combined with Ab interno trabecular excision: SIONTM versus Kahook Dual Blade® (KDB®). Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):3476.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To compare outcomes of phacoemulsification (Phaco) combined with ab interno trabecular excision using the SIONTM device (Phaco/SION) to ab interno trabecular excision using the Kahook Dual Blade® (Phaco/KDB).

Methods : A total of 551 visits from 93 patients were reviewed following either Phaco/SION or Phaco/KDB from 2018-2023. Two Kaplan-Meier curves (KM) assessed survival with ≤ baseline meds while maintaining (1) [GSC - Goal Success Criteria] IOP ≤ goal IOP or (2) [QSC - Qualified Success Criteria] IOP reduction ≥ 20% with 5 mmHg ≤ IOP ≤ 21 mmHg for at least two consecutive visits. IOP and medication burden reduction were compared using a paired t-test. Retrospective, comparative study from a tertiary care center.

Results : Thirty-one patients had Phaco/SION and 62 underwent Phaco/KDB. The most common glaucoma type in both groups was primary open-angle glaucoma (32% in Phaco/SION vs. 47% in Phaco/KDB; p=0.1). Both groups had similar baseline demographics except for baseline number of medications. Mean preoperative IOP was 15.92 ± 3.53 mmHg on 1.81 medications in Phaco/SION and 15.92 ± 4.34 mmHg on 0.19 ± 0.70 medications in Phaco/KDB (p=0.99 for IOP; p<0.001 for medications). Under GSC, the success rate was higher in the Phaco/SION at POM6 (97% vs 90%; p=0.35) and POY1 (97% vs 87%; p=0.36), although the difference was not statistically significant. Under QSC, the success rate was significantly higher in the Phaco/SION at POM6 (83% vs 50%; p<0.01) and POY1 (83% vs 37%; p<0.01). Mean IOP at POM6 was 11.97 ± 3.53 mmHg on 1.18 less medications after Phaco/SION and 13.02 ± 2.71 mmHg on 0.15 less medications after Phaco/KDB (p=0.28 for IOP; p<0.001 for medications).

Conclusions : Phaco/SION may provide greater medication reduction than Phaco/KDB as well as more favorable QSC survival rates while maintaining a similar IOP reduction.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

 

Survival comparison for Phaco/SION vs Phaco/KDB under qualified success criteria: IOP reduction ≥ 20% with 5 mmHg ≤ IOP ≤ 21 mmHg.

Survival comparison for Phaco/SION vs Phaco/KDB under qualified success criteria: IOP reduction ≥ 20% with 5 mmHg ≤ IOP ≤ 21 mmHg.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×