Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
Exploring Uveitis Content on TikTok: An Analysis of Quality and Misinformation
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Nicholas Chartrand
    The University of Arizona College of Medicine Phoenix, Phoenix, Arizona, United States
  • Nina Cherian
    The University of Arizona College of Medicine Phoenix, Phoenix, Arizona, United States
  • Alexander Shusko
    Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Nicholas Chartrand None; Nina Cherian None; Alexander Shusko None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 3006. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Nicholas Chartrand, Nina Cherian, Alexander Shusko; Exploring Uveitis Content on TikTok: An Analysis of Quality and Misinformation. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):3006.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : The increasing reliance on social media for health information prompts an investigation into the quality of uveitis-related content on TikTok. We performed a cross-sectional study to assess the content's quality and the prevalence of misinformation.

Methods : Conducted on November 27, a TikTok search targeted uveitis-related hashtags, analyzing engagement data (likes, comments, views, shares, and favorites) for the top 100 videos per hashtag. Classifications included informative, misinformation, patient experience, or miscellaneous. Content creators were categorized as layperson, ophthalmologist, optometrist, chiropractor, and other MD/DO. Statistical tests (Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis H) were used to compare engagement metrics between content classification and creators.

Results : Ten uveitis-related hashtags yielded 515 videos, amassing 43,379,299 views, 2,942,809 likes, 31,178 comments, and 27,858 shares. Laypeople generated the majority (91.8%) of content, followed by optometrists (3.1%), ophthalmologists (2.2%), other MD/DOs (1.6%), and chiropractors (1.4%). The most common type of content was patient experiences (53.5%), while 9.4% of content was identified as misinformation, 11.2% as informative, and 23.9% as miscellaneous. No statistically significant differences were found in engagement metrics between misinformation and informative videos or across content creator types.

Conclusions : Analysis reveals a substantial presence of patient experiences and notable misinformation in uveitis-related TikTok content. Laypeople generated 91.8% of content and only 5.3% of content came from Eyecare providers, demonstrating the need for more Eyecare professionals on the platform to give patients accurate information about their uveitic conditions. These results underscore the need for improved accuracy and quality in health information dissemination on social media. Efforts to address misinformation and enhance content quality should be prioritized to better serve the digital health information-seeking community.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

 

Table 1: Engagement metrics for uveitis-related videos on TikTok. Data presented as mean ± SD (Min - Max).

Table 1: Engagement metrics for uveitis-related videos on TikTok. Data presented as mean ± SD (Min - Max).

 

Figure 1. Content category of uveitis-related TikTok videos sorted by hashtag.

Figure 1. Content category of uveitis-related TikTok videos sorted by hashtag.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×