Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
Influence of Age and Gender on Visual Field Test Duration in Healthy Subjects
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Jacqueline S Armani
    Topcon Healthcare, Oakland, New Jersey, United States
  • Lana J Luccitti
    Topcon Healthcare, Oakland, New Jersey, United States
  • Susan Su
    Topcon Healthcare, Oakland, New Jersey, United States
  • Mary Durbin
    Topcon Healthcare, Oakland, New Jersey, United States
  • Derek Ho
    Topcon Healthcare, Oakland, New Jersey, United States
  • Mayra Tafreshi
    Topcon Healthcare, Oakland, New Jersey, United States
  • Vincent Michael Patella
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of Iowa Health Care, Iowa City, Iowa, United States
  • Timothy Bossie
    New England College of Optometry, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
  • David Kasanoff
    New View Optometric Center, La Mesa, California, United States
  • Michael A Chaglasian
    Illinois College of Optometry, Chicago, Illinois, United States
  • Nevin W. El-Nimri
    Topcon Healthcare, Oakland, New Jersey, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Jacqueline Armani Topcon Healthcare, Code E (Employment); Lana Luccitti Topcon Healthcare, Code E (Employment); Susan Su Topcon Healthcare, Code E (Employment); Mary Durbin Topcon Healthcare, Code E (Employment); Derek Ho Topcon Healthcare, Code E (Employment); Mayra Tafreshi Topcon Healthcare, Code E (Employment); Vincent Michael Patella Topcon Healthcare, Code C (Consultant/Contractor); Timothy Bossie Topcon Healthcare, Code C (Consultant/Contractor); David Kasanoff Topcon Healthcare, Code C (Consultant/Contractor); Michael Chaglasian Topcon Healthcare, Code C (Consultant/Contractor); Nevin El-Nimri Topcon Healthcare, Code E (Employment)
  • Footnotes
    Support  none
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 6354. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Jacqueline S Armani, Lana J Luccitti, Susan Su, Mary Durbin, Derek Ho, Mayra Tafreshi, Vincent Michael Patella, Timothy Bossie, David Kasanoff, Michael A Chaglasian, Nevin W. El-Nimri; Influence of Age and Gender on Visual Field Test Duration in Healthy Subjects. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):6354.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Tolerable test duration of clinical perimetry examinations is crucial for ensuring result accuracy. A prior investigation demonstrated a 39% reduction in measurement time with a novel binocular visual field (VF) testing device in comparison to other Standard Automated Perimetry (SAP) alternatives. This study investigates the impact of age and gender on test duration of binocular VF testing within a cohort of healthy subjects.

Methods : A diverse sample of healthy subjects was recruited for this study. All subjects underwent 10-2 and 24-2 binocular visual field testing with the TEMPO/IMOvifa Perimeter (Topcon Healthcare/CREWT Medical Systems, Tokyo, Japan) utilizing SAP testing standards: Goldmann stimulus size III, maximum stimulus intensity of 3183 candelas/meter2 and a background intensity of 10 candelas/meter2. The AIZE-Rapid testing strategy and Heijl-Krakau gaze monitoring were used. Subjects were stratified into groups based upon age in decades and gender for cross-sectional analysis. A committee of two perimetry experts vetted all included visual field tests regarding test reliability; all tests had fixation loss, false negative, and false positive reliability index findings of ≤ 25% and were found to be acceptable for inclusion in a reference database.

Results : Visual field test duration was examined for 356 healthy subjects (ages 22-93 years). 56% of the subjects identified as female. Mean binocular test duration was 3:19 +/- 0:23 (mm:ss) (1 minute 35 seconds per eye) for 24-2 threshold VF testing and 3:51 +/- 0:22 (mm:ss) (1 minute 47 seconds per eye) for 10-2. The mean test times were comparable across all age groups on both 24-2 and 10-2 (p>0.05 for all) (Figure 1). Similarly, no notable difference was observed in mean test duration between males and females on either 24-2 or 10-2 VF testing (p >0.05 for all).

Conclusions : Visual field test duration is comparable across a diverse range of ages and between genders in a healthy population. The findings of this study support that patient, irrespective of age and gender, can efficiently undergo VF testing on TEMPO, minimizing fatigue and ultimately enhancing test accuracy.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

 

Figure 1. Mean 24-2 exam time vs. age range. Mean test duration is comparable among all age groups for 24-2 threshold testing.

Figure 1. Mean 24-2 exam time vs. age range. Mean test duration is comparable among all age groups for 24-2 threshold testing.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×