Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
Comparison of Traction Forces in Ex-situ Vitrectomy Using 25-Ga 20000 CPM Dual Blade Vitrectomy Probes and 25-Ga 10000 CPM Single Blade Vitrectomy Probes
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Brian McDonell
    Alcon Laboratories Inc, Fort Worth, Texas, United States
  • Ying Zhu
    Alcon Laboratories Inc, Fort Worth, Texas, United States
  • Kevin Phan
    Alcon Laboratories Inc, Fort Worth, Texas, United States
  • Vara Wuyyuru
    Alcon Laboratories Inc, Fort Worth, Texas, United States
  • Steve Charles
    Hamilton Eye Institute, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center College of Medicine, Memphis, Tennessee, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Brian McDonell Alcon, Code E (Employment); Ying Zhu Alcon, Code E (Employment); Kevin Phan Alcon, Code E (Employment); Vara Wuyyuru Alcon, Code E (Employment); Steve Charles Alcon, Code C (Consultant/Contractor)
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 902. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Brian McDonell, Ying Zhu, Kevin Phan, Vara Wuyyuru, Steve Charles; Comparison of Traction Forces in Ex-situ Vitrectomy Using 25-Ga 20000 CPM Dual Blade Vitrectomy Probes and 25-Ga 10000 CPM Single Blade Vitrectomy Probes. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):902.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : This study compared the traction forces produced in an ex-situ vitrectomy setting at flow-matched conditions between 25+ Ga HYPERVIT® Dual Blade vitrectomy probes operating at 20000 CPM and single blade 25+ Ga Advanced ULTRAVIT® vitrectomy probes operating at 10000 CPM.

Methods : Testing was performed using bovine vitreous. Ten Alcon 25+ Ga HYPERVIT® beveled 20K CPM vitrectomy probes and Alcon 25+ Ga Advanced ULTRAVIT® beveled 10K CPM vitrectomy probes were used in flow-matched conditions. Vitreous flow testing was first performed on both types of probes to determine the vacuum levels that resulted in an equivalent flow rate when aspirating pure vitreous. Each probe was advanced towards the vitreous which was suspended in a chamber filled with BSS. The vitreous also was attached to a force sensor. The traction force, flow rate, probe position, and pressure signals were recorded. The data was analyzed to determine the force distribution as well as the mean force, peak force in each cut cycle, and maximum force. Statistical analysis was performed with P <0.05.

Results : The flow testing identified the flow-normalizing vacuum settings during aspiration were 260 mmHg for the 25+Ga HYPERVIT® 20K probes and 340 mmHg for the 25+Ga Advanced ULTRAVIT® 10K probes.
When tested at the flow-normalizing aspiration levels, 25+ HYPERVIT® Dual Blade probes generated fewer high traction forces compared to 25+ Advanced ULTRAVIT® probes. After removing the low force regions (<0.5mN), for each percentile above the 66th percentile, the force was significantly lower for the HYPERVIT® compared to the Advanced ULTRAVIT® at the same percentile level (P<0.05). For example, the 90th, 95th, and 99th percentile forces were smaller by 12.8%, 14.4%, and 14.4%, respectively. Again, removing the low force regions, 25+ HYPERVIT® showed decreased average force, average peak force, and average maximum force during the whole process by 8.01%, 15.78%, and 12.22%, respectively, compared to 25+ Adv ULTRAVIT® probes (P<0.05).

Conclusions : The study revealed that 25+Ga HYPERVIT® dual blade probes generated lower traction forces compared to 25+Ga Advanced ULTRAVIT® probes when removing vitreous at the same flow rate suggesting their potential advantage during vitrectomy with a lower likelihood of high traction force occurrence and reduced adverse events.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×