Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
Endogenous Fungal Endophthalmitis: A Single-Center Retrospective Study and Review of the Literature
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Eleanor Burton
    Ophthalmology, UVA Health, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
  • Vishal Reddy
    University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
  • Arthi Venkat
    Ophthalmology, UVA Health, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Eleanor Burton None; Vishal Reddy None; Arthi Venkat None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 783. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Eleanor Burton, Vishal Reddy, Arthi Venkat; Endogenous Fungal Endophthalmitis: A Single-Center Retrospective Study and Review of the Literature. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):783.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Although current Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines recommend the use of systemic antifungal in patients with endogenous fungal endophthalmitis (EFE), there is no robust evidence to support the use of intravenous (IV) versus oral antifungal therapy. The purpose of this study is to describe treatment strategies and outcomes in patients with EFE, including considerations that inform systemic antifungal therapeutic choices.

Methods : This is a retrospective chart review at a single institution. Charts of patients diagnosed with EFE between 2010 and 2023 were reviewed for inclusion. Patients who received systemic treatment for EFE with a minimum of 14 days of follow-up were included. Outcome measures include time to improvement in vitritis or chorioretinitis, change in systemic therapy, and need for surgical intervention.

Results : Twenty eyes of 16 patients were included. Candida species were the most common pathogen (43.8%), followed by culture negative EFE (37.5%), and Aspergillus species (18.8%). Ninety percent of eyes had either vitritis and/or macula-involving chorioretinitis.

Most patients with Candida infections (60%) or culture negative EFE (75%) were treated initially with oral antifungals. Patients with a history of immune compromise, known positive fungal culture, or positive Fungitell assay were more likely to be treated with early IV antifungal therapy. Two cases required systemic antifungal therapy modification despite early initiation of intravitreal antifungal injections. In one case of rare voriconazole-resistant Aspergillosis, ongoing chorioretinal lesion growth despite intravitreal amphotericin B injections was an early sign of drug resistance; in the second case, a patient with C. dubliniensis demonstrated chorioretinal lesions regression only after switching from oral to IV fluconazole.

Conclusions : Initial systemic treatment decisions were driven primarily by systemic culture positivity, perceived systemic illness secondary to fungal infection, or the presence of comorbidities. Intravitreal antifungal therapy is an effective adjunct for the treatment of vitreous involvement but is not sufficient to arrest progression of chorioretinal lesions. In some cases, visible end-organ damage in the form of chorioretinitis may indicate the need for a change in systemic therapy and may serve as a surrogate for culture sensitivities.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×