Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
Perceived Challenges, Information Needs, and Interaction Preferences of Blind and Visually Impaired Users When Interacting with Fully Autonomous Vehicles
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Jing Xu
    Schepens Eye Research Institute of Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
    Envision Research Institute, Wichita, Kansas, United States
  • Kayla Shaw
    Envision Research Institute, Wichita, Kansas, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Jing Xu None; Kayla Shaw None
  • Footnotes
    Support  Bosma Enterprises Low Vision Research Award
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 442. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Jing Xu, Kayla Shaw; Perceived Challenges, Information Needs, and Interaction Preferences of Blind and Visually Impaired Users When Interacting with Fully Autonomous Vehicles. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):442.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Despite high expectations for Fully Autonomous Vehicles (FAVs) within the blind and visually impaired (BVI) community, concerns persist regarding accessibility and user-vehicle interaction. Through a telephone questionnaire, we explored perceived challenges, information needs, and interface preferences of BVI users in anticipation of future FAV implementation.

Methods : We interviewed 120 individuals (median age 55, 44% male): 32 totally blind, 31 severely visually impaired (SVI), 30 mildly visually impaired (MVI), and 27 with normal vision (NV). They were asked about perceived challenges and information needs across 6 steps in using FAVs and ranked their preferences for user-vehicle interfaces in different use scenarios. Their perceptions and concerns about FAVs were discussed.

Results : 41% of the Blind and SVI groups believed the BVI community was considered in FAV development, compared to 20% MVI and 33% NV. The perceived likelihood of using FAVs increased with the severity of visual impairment (81% Blind, 65% SVI, 48% MVI, 19% NV, p=0.016). Besides owning a personal FAV, all groups preferred choosing long-term subscriptions over AV ride-hailing services and AV public transportation. For all groups, dealing with unexpected situations and finding the destination after being dropped off were among the most challenging steps when using FAVs. In addition, the Blind and SVI reported identifying the FAV when it arrives as challenging while the MVI and NV groups reported booking a ride as challenging. Blind and VI groups prioritized information needs to help them stay aware of surroundings through accessible interfaces, while the NV group preferred information for reassurance about safety and functionality through visual notifications. All groups agreed on voice interaction (>83%) and live assistance (>51%) as top preferences when using FAVs. Blind group also favored cellphone interaction (44%), while other groups preferred touch screen (>45%).

Conclusions : The Blind group expressed the highest intention of using FAVs, with personal FAV ownership being the most preferred mode of utilization. Handling unexpected situations was universally perceived as the most difficult step, with identifying the arriving car particularly challenging for Blind and SVI groups. All subjects preferred voice interaction and wanted live assistance during emergencies.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×