Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
Impact of parental myopia on myopia control efficacy of spectacle lenses with cylindrical annular refractive elements (CARE)
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Christina Boeck-Maier
    ZEISS Vision Care, Carl Zeiss Vision International GmbH, Aalen, Germany
  • Padmaja Sankaridurg
    ZEISS Vision Care, Carl Zeiss Vision International GmbH, Aalen, Germany
    School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  • Arne Ohlendorf
    ZEISS Vision Care, Carl Zeiss Vision International GmbH, Aalen, Germany
  • Katharina Rifai
    ZEISS Vision Care, Carl Zeiss Vision International GmbH, Aalen, Germany
  • Siegfried Wahl
    ZEISS Vision Care, Carl Zeiss Vision International GmbH, Aalen, Germany
    Institute for Ophthalmic Research, Eberhard Karls Universitat Tubingen, Tuebingen, Germany
  • Xiaoqin Chen
    Tianjin Eye Hospital Optometric Center, Tianjin, Tianjin, China
  • Cui Yu
    Shenyang He Eye Hospital, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
  • Min Wu
    Beijing Tongren Vision Care, Beijing Tongren Hospital CMU, Beijing, Beijing, China
  • Yi Zhu
    ZEISS Vision Care, Carl Zeiss Vision (Guangzhou) Ltd., Guangzhou, Guandong, China
  • Youhua Yang
    ZEISS Vision Care, Carl Zeiss Vision (Guangzhou) Ltd., Guangzhou, Guandong, China
  • Lihua Li
    Tianjin Eye Hospital Optometric Center, Tianjin, Tianjin, China
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Christina Boeck-Maier ZEISS Vision Care, Code E (Employment); Padmaja Sankaridurg ZEISS Vision Care, Code E (Employment), Shamir, Code F (Financial Support), Brien Holden Vision Institute, Code P (Patent), Essilor International, Code R (Recipient), SightGlass Vision, Code R (Recipient); Arne Ohlendorf ZEISS Vision Care, Code E (Employment); Katharina Rifai ZEISS Vision Care, Code E (Employment); Siegfried Wahl ZEISS Vision Care, Code E (Employment); Xiaoqin Chen ZEISS Vision Care, Code F (Financial Support); Cui Yu ZEISS Vision Care, Code F (Financial Support); Min Wu ZEISS Vision Care, Code F (Financial Support); Yi Zhu ZEISS Vision Care, Code E (Employment); Youhua Yang ZEISS Vision Care, Code E (Employment); Lihua Li ZEISS Vision Care, Code F (Financial Support)
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 146. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Christina Boeck-Maier, Padmaja Sankaridurg, Arne Ohlendorf, Katharina Rifai, Siegfried Wahl, Xiaoqin Chen, Cui Yu, Min Wu, Yi Zhu, Youhua Yang, Lihua Li; Impact of parental myopia on myopia control efficacy of spectacle lenses with cylindrical annular refractive elements (CARE). Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):146.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To explore the impact of parental myopia on 1-year myopia control efficacy in children wearing spectacle lenses (SPL) with cylindrical annular refractive elements (CARE) compared to single vision (SV) SPL.

Methods : In an ongoing 2-year prospective, double-masked, multi-center clinical trial (NCT05288335), 240 Chinese children aged 6-13 yrs., spherical equivalent refractive error (SE) -0.75D to -5.00D, were enrolled and randomly assigned to one of three groups: (1) single vision spectacles (SV, N=80); (2) MyoCare (ZEISS) with CARE mean surface power of +4.6D and a central clear zone of 7mm (N=80); or (3) MyoCare S (ZEISS) with CARE mean surface power +3.8D and 9mm central clear zone (N=80). Cycloplegic SE and axial length (AL) were measured at six-monthly intervals, and change in SE and AL from baseline was determined. Parental myopia (none, one, or both) was determined at baseline. One-way ANOVAs were calculated to evaluate the effect of parental myopia (yes or no) on SE and AL progression over 12 months in SV, MyoCare, and MyoCare S wearers, respectively.

Results : In SV lens wearers, there was a relationship between myopia progression and parental myopia, with significantly higher progression of SE (F(1, 63)=5.33, p=.02) and a statistical trend for higher progression of AL (F(1, 63)=3.33, p=.07) in children with parental myopia (one or both parents myopic: -0.73±0.39D/0.35±0.17mm) compared to no parental myopia (-0.47±0.41D/0.27±0.16mm). In contrast, SE and AL progression was not significantly related to parental myopia in MyoCare (without parental myopia: -0.33±0.34D/0.18±0.12mm; with parental myopia: -0.34±0.43D/0.19±0.17mm) and MyoCare S wearers (without parental myopia: -0.37±0.32D/0.23±0.06mm; with parental myopia: -0.35±0.39D/0.20±0.16mm).

Conclusions : In children wearing single vision SPL, myopia progressed faster in those with parental myopia. In comparison, in children wearing SPL incorporating CARE, myopia progression was not significantly related to parental myopia.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×