Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
Selective quantification of rod and cone photoreceptors using a high-resolution optical coherence tomography device.
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Leon Alexander von der Emde
    Ophthalmology, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universitat Bonn, Bonn, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
  • Julius Ameln
    Ophthalmology, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universitat Bonn, Bonn, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
  • Aleksandr Gutnikov
    Ophthalmology, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universitat Bonn, Bonn, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
  • Giulia Ritter
    Ophthalmology, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universitat Bonn, Bonn, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
  • Frank G Holz
    Ophthalmology, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universitat Bonn, Bonn, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
  • Wolf Harmening
    Ophthalmology, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universitat Bonn, Bonn, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
  • Thomas Ach
    Ophthalmology, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universitat Bonn, Bonn, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Leon von der Emde None; Julius Ameln None; Aleksandr Gutnikov None; Giulia Ritter None; Frank Holz Acuela, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Appellis, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Bayer, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Boehringer-Ingelheim, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), BIoeq/Formycon, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Gueder, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), IvericBio, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Oxurion, Code C (Consultant/Contractor); Wolf Harmening None; Thomas Ach Appellis, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Appellis, Code R (Recipient), Bayer, Code R (Recipient), Roche, Code R (Recipient), Novartis, Code R (Recipient), NIDEK, Code R (Recipient), abF Campus, Code R (Recipient), Johnson&JOhnson, Code R (Recipient)
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 1420. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Leon Alexander von der Emde, Julius Ameln, Aleksandr Gutnikov, Giulia Ritter, Frank G Holz, Wolf Harmening, Thomas Ach; Selective quantification of rod and cone photoreceptors using a high-resolution optical coherence tomography device.. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):1420.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : New clinical-grade, high-resolution optical coherence tomography (OCT) with significantly increased axial resolution reveals a splitting of the hyperreflective band at the interdigitation-zone, presumably coinciding with the rod and cone outer segments tips (cone outer segments [COS] and rod outer segments [ROS]). The aim of this study was to investigate whether the thickness and intensity of these bands correspond to rod and cone photoreceptor (PR) density.

Methods : Five eyes of five subjects (22, 29, 33, 45, 67 years; 2 females) were imaged using adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy at 0.5 mm (transition from cone- to rod-dominated retina), 1 mm and 2 mm temporally from the fovea. High resolution OCT volume scans (High-Res OCT, Spectralis, Heidelberg Engineering, 121 B-scans, 30X25 mm, ART=25) were semi-automatically annotated, converted to enface maps and the thickness and intensity profiles (normalized to Bruch’s membrane) extracted for the corresponding locations. These profiles were statistically analyzed using separate linear regression models for both rod and cones densities.

Results : Cone PR density was highest at 0.5 mm (42,083 ± 3,960 cones/mm2) and decreased peripherally (2 mm: 11,748 ± 926 cones/mm2). In parallel, COS thickness (27 ± 3 to 20 ± 3 µm) and maximum intensity (90->62%) decreased. In contrast, rod density was lowest at 0.5 mm (38,056 ± 4,137 cones/mm2) and increased at higher eccentricities (2 mm: 96,914 ± 8,479 rods/mm2), while ROS thickness (3 ± 4 to 16 ± 3) and maximum intensity (20% -> 64%) showed a similar increase. The regression analysis for rods indicated a significant positive relationship between rod density and ROS, with an increase of 1 micrometer in thickness for additional 2,512 rods per square millimeter (p = <0.01), explaining 42% of the variance (Intensity: p = 0.13, R2 = 0.16). Cone density was similarly related to COS (Thickness: p =< 0.01, R2 = 0.47 / Intensity: p = 0.02, R2 = 0.3).

Conclusions : Results indicate a correspondence between high resolution OCT-derived ROS and COS measurements and AOSLO-derived PR densities, allowing for a fast and selective quantification of PRs using routine clinical imaging techniques. These findings will guide our future research if the COS and ROS microstructure can be utilized to track loss of PR and whether retinal microstructure can reflect rod and cone function with age and disease.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×