Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
Disruptions of emmetropization via targeted spectral and temporal modulation of evening light exposure
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Manshul Nagpaul
    Bioscience and Disease, New England College of Optometry, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
  • Christopher Patrick Taylor
    Bioscience and Disease, New England College of Optometry, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
  • Xia Carlstedt
    Bioscience and Disease, New England College of Optometry, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
  • Frances J Rucker
    Bioscience and Disease, New England College of Optometry, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
  • Debora L Nickla
    Bioscience and Disease, New England College of Optometry, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Manshul Nagpaul None; Christopher Taylor US 11,110,292 B2, Code P (Patent); Xia Carlstedt None; Frances Rucker US 11,110,292 B2, Code P (Patent); Debora Nickla None
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIH-NEI-EY025307
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 1181. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Manshul Nagpaul, Christopher Patrick Taylor, Xia Carlstedt, Frances J Rucker, Debora L Nickla; Disruptions of emmetropization via targeted spectral and temporal modulation of evening light exposure. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):1181.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : While “day” exposure to blue light appears important for emmetropization in animal models, and for inhibiting myopia in children, in chicks, exposure in the evening results in growth stimulation (Nickla et al., 2022). While most hypotheses implicate the circadian system for evening blue light effects, questions remain regarding the contribution of the ipRGCs, and whether the crucial variable is blue light per se.

Methods : All stimuli are given from ZT8-ZT12 for 9 days. High frequency ultrasound measured ocular biometry. I. Is there a “blue light dose-response” for white light? White light (600 lux) with varying amounts of blue were tested: Low (n=8), mid (n=8) and high (n=8). II. Is it only “blue”? We tested “Yellow” (n=15) (700 lux; 490-650 nm) and “Red” light (n=13) (700 lux; 630 +/-12 nm). Controls were in “flat white” light (n=8). III. Are the ipRGCs involved? We used silent substitution to preferentially stimulate melanopsin (n=16). Temporal illuminance contrast (27%) was created with 7 primary LEDs (Ledmotive) flickered at 0.033 Hz. (Spitschan & Woelders, 2018). To control for temporal effects, we tested white light at 0.033 Hz using the same illuminances (n=16).

Results : I. There was a “dose response” with increasing blue resulting in increasing eye growth (749, 803, 892 µm/9d; ANOVA p<0.0001; low and mid vs. high, p<0.01). II. Both evening yellow and red conditions increased eye growth relative to white controls (954 µm and 914 µm vs 782 µm/9d, ANOVA p<0.01; post hoc Bonferroni p<0.01). Choroid thickening was seen in the “red” condition (22 µm vs -26 µm; p<0.05), and the choroidal rhythm was abolished in “yellow”. III. Our “melanopsin” condition stimulated growth relative to the “steady flat white” control (861 vs 782 µm/9d; p<0.05), however, “white flicker control” resulted in a similar stimulation (894 µm/9d). The “melanopsin” condition resulted in a phase-delay in the choroidal rhythm, supporting an effect on the circadian system.

Conclusions : Evening blue light may impair emmetropization in a dose-dependent manner via melanopsin stimulation, but contributions from other cones are likely. A signal from LCA may promote growth in the evening “red”/"yellow" conditions as it does in daytime “red”/"yellow" rearing. Evening light exposure to altered spectra promotes eye growth, but whether the effect is due to disruption of LCA signals, circadian influences or both remains unclear.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×