Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
Effect of Management Options on Demodex Blepharitis Patients
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Anh Nguyen Ho
    Tarsus Pharmaceuticals Inc, Irvine, California, United States
  • James J Mun
    Tarsus Pharmaceuticals Inc, Irvine, California, United States
  • Walter Whitley
    Tarsus Pharmaceuticals Inc, Irvine, California, United States
  • Elizabeth Yeu
    Tarsus Pharmaceuticals Inc, Irvine, California, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Anh Ho Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Code E (Employment); James Mun Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Code E (Employment); Walter Whitley Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Code C (Consultant/Contractor); Elizabeth Yeu Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Code F (Financial Support)
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 2845. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Anh Nguyen Ho, James J Mun, Walter Whitley, Elizabeth Yeu; Effect of Management Options on Demodex Blepharitis Patients. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):2845.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Demodex blepharitis (DB) is a highly prevalent, chronic eyelid disease that can have a significant burden on the patients. Until recent FDA approval of lotilaner ophthalmic solution 0.25%, various management options and medications, were used off-label for symptom management in DB. The aim of this study is to evaluate the response of ocular symptoms in DB patients who have used non-FDA approved or off-label medications and management options.

Methods : A web-based survey was conducted among US patients (21 – 85 years of age) with a confirmed DB diagnosis by a healthcare provider from June to August 2022. Patients were asked about their ocular symptoms and the quality of life, mental and physical burden, of DB.

Results : A total of 113 patients with DB responded to the survey. 21% of respondents reported using a prescription anti-inflammatory dry eye topical medication, 16% hypochlorous acid, 8% ivermectin, 27% oral antibiotics, 18% topical antibiotics, 55% tea tree oil, and 68% warm eye compress. Of the DB patients on topical dry eye medication, only 46% had a diagnosis of dry eye disease. Compared to those who were not on dry eye medications (79%), DB patients on dry eye medications tended to experience higher rates of ocular redness (38% vs. 28%), itchy eyes (33% vs. 27%), swollen eyelids (33% vs. 18%), ocular burning or stinging (25% vs. 18%), difficulty wearing contact lenses (25% vs. 13%), and crusted eyelashes (25% vs. 12%). Similar trends were observed for all symptoms (especially for ocular redness) when comparing those on and not on hypochlorous acid (41% vs. 28% for ocular redness), ivermectin (44% vs. 29%), oral antibiotics (45% vs. 24%), topical antibiotics (37% vs. 28%), tea tree oil (31% vs. 29%) and warm eye compress (36% vs. 18%).

Conclusions : The results highlight the unclear benefit of prescription immunomodulatory dry eye topical medications used off-label and other management options in alleviating ocular symptoms in patients with DB. Off-label use of therapies, including prescription anti-inflammatory topical medications, may worsen the symptomatology of DB patients.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×