Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
Clinical Performance of Two Commercially Available Daily Disposable Silicone Hydrogel Toric Soft Contact Lenses: Verofilcon A and Stenfilcon A
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Lakshman N Subbaraman
    Alcon Research LLC, Johns Creek, Georgia, United States
  • Katherine Bickle
    ProCare Vision Centers, Inc, Granville, Ohio, United States
  • John Capellani
    Franklin Park Eye Center PC, Franklin Park, Illinois, United States
  • Jennifer Chin
    Kurata Eyecare Center, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Bradley Giedd
    Kindred Optics at Maitland Vision, Maitland, Florida, United States
  • Bradley Hines
    Optometry Group, PLLC, Memphis, Tennessee, United States
  • Gina Wesley
    Wesley Optometric Consulting, Medina, Minnesota, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Lakshman Subbaraman Alcon Research LLC, Code E (Employment); Katherine Bickle Alcon Research LLC, Code C (Consultant/Contractor); John Capellani Alcon Research LLC, Code C (Consultant/Contractor); Jennifer Chin Alcon Research LLC, Code C (Consultant/Contractor); Bradley Giedd Alcon Research LLC, Code C (Consultant/Contractor); Bradley Hines Alcon Research LLC, Code C (Consultant/Contractor); Gina Wesley Alcon Research LLC, Code C (Consultant/Contractor)
  • Footnotes
    Support  This study was funded by Alcon. Lakshman Subbaraman is an employee of Alcon.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 2696. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Lakshman N Subbaraman, Katherine Bickle, John Capellani, Jennifer Chin, Bradley Giedd, Bradley Hines, Gina Wesley; Clinical Performance of Two Commercially Available Daily Disposable Silicone Hydrogel Toric Soft Contact Lenses: Verofilcon A and Stenfilcon A. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):2696.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To evaluate the clinical performance of commercially available, verofilcon A toric and stenfilcon A toric soft contact lenses (SCLs).

Methods : A prospective, randomized, controlled, double-masked, bilateral, crossover, multicenter study was conducted in the US (NCT05483127). Habitual toric SCL wearers aged ≥18 years were randomized to wear verofilcon A toric or stenfilcon A toric SCLs bilaterally for 8-11 days, and crossed-over to the alternate toric SCLs. Primary endpoint was distance visual acuity (VA; logMAR) at week 1 (noninferiority margin: 0.05). Other endpoints evaluated at week 1: subjective ratings for “my lenses felt comfortable all day” at 16 hours (5-point scale: strongly agree to strongly disagree); lens movement (-2=unacceptably tight to +2=unacceptably loose); lens position (0=optimal centration to 2=unacceptable decentration); and front surface wettability (0=smooth uniform to 4=non-wettable); and front/back surface deposits (0=absent to 4=severe).

Results : Overall, 152 subjects were randomized to the study toric SCLs (mean age: 34.4±9.0 years; female: 61.8%). Verofilcon A toric SCLs were noninferior to stenfilcon A toric SCLs for distance VA at week 1 (mean±SD logMAR: -0.11±0.07 vs -0.10±0.07; 95% UCL of LSM difference: -0.00). At 16 hours, more subjects using verofilcon A toric (53.7%) compared to stenfilcon A toric (43.6%) SCLs strongly agreed/agreed that the lenses felt comfortable all day (p=0.0165). Both toric SCLs had optimal/acceptable movement (in both primary and peripheral gazes) and optimal centration/acceptable decentration (verofilcon A toric: 100%; stenfilcon A toric: 100%). Most of the toric SCLs had grade 0 front surface wettability (verofilcon A: 86.4%; stenfilcon A: 85.4%) and surface deposits (verofilcon A: front 88.7%, back 95.4%; stenfilcon A: front 86.1%, back 94.0%) at week 1.

Conclusions : Verofilcon A toric SCLs were noninferior to stenfilcon A toric SCLs for distance visual acuity at week 1. Verofilcon A toric SCLs had higher subjective ratings compared to stenfilcon A toric SCLs for comfort (at 16 hours). Both toric SCLs had optimal movement and centration, and clean wettable surface.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×