Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
Demographics and clinical outcomes in IWOS criteria-diagnosed ocular sarcoidosis versus idiopathic uveitis with similar ocular manifestations
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Hiroshi Keino
    Ophthalmology, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
  • Katsuya Nagahori:
    Ophthalmology, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
  • Isami Hayashi
    Ophthalmology, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
    Ophthalmology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
  • Yoshimasa Ando
    Ophthalmology, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
  • Shoko Saito
    Ophthalmology, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
  • Takayo Watanabe
    Ophthalmology, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
  • Makiko Nakayama
    Ophthalmology, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
  • Annabelle A Okada
    Ophthalmology, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Hiroshi Keino ALCON Japan,, Code F (Financial Support), Bayer Yakuhin Ltd.,, Code R (Recipient), Senju Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.,, Code R (Recipient), AbbVie GK,, Code R (Recipient), Novartis Pharma KK,, Code R (Recipient); Katsuya Nagahori: None; Isami Hayashi None; Yoshimasa Ando None; Shoko Saito None; Takayo Watanabe None; Makiko Nakayama None; Annabelle A Okada None
  • Footnotes
    Support  Research grant from Kyorin Univerisity School of Medicine
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 2624. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Hiroshi Keino, Katsuya Nagahori:, Isami Hayashi, Yoshimasa Ando, Shoko Saito, Takayo Watanabe, Makiko Nakayama, Annabelle A Okada; Demographics and clinical outcomes in IWOS criteria-diagnosed ocular sarcoidosis versus idiopathic uveitis with similar ocular manifestations. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):2624.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To investigate whether IWOS criteria-diagnosed ocular sarcoidosis differs from idiopathic uveitis with similar ocular manifestations with respect to demographics, clinical course, and visual outcomes.

Methods : “IWOS criteria-diagnosed ocular sarcoidosis” was defined as uveitis with features meeting the International Workshop on Ocular Sarcoidosis (IWOS) criteria, and “suspected ocular sarcoidosis” was defined as idiopathic uveitis with at least 3 of 7 IWOS ocular clinical signs suggestive of but not meeting the IWOS criteria for ocular sarcoidosis. Clinical records were retrospectively reviewed of 107 patients (210 eyes with uveitis) with IWOS criteria-diagnosed ocular sarcoidosis (OS group) and 37 patients (73 eyes with uveitis) with suspected ocular sarcoidosis (SS group) presenting between 2011 and 2018 to the Kyorin Eye Center.

Results : The mean age at presentation was 60 years for the OS group and 59 years for the SS group. The percentage of women was 71% for the OS group and 78% for the SS group. The anatomic type of uveitis was panuveitis in 85% and 97% of patients in the OS and SS groups, respectively. The mean follow-up period was significantly longer for the OS group (48 months) compared to that for the SS group (29 months). Laboratory work-up demonstrated that both the serum levels of angiotensin converting enzyme and soluble interleukin-2 receptor were significantly higher for the OS group. There was no significant difference in rate of ocular complications including cataract, glaucoma, and macular edema between the 2 groups. Furthermore, the percentage of patients receiving systemic corticosteroid therapy or sub-Tenon triamcinolone injections was comparable in the 2 groups. There was no significant difference in percentage of eyes with a best-corrected visual acuity of greater than or equal to 1.0 between the 2 groups at 1 and 3 years after presentation.

Conclusions : No significant difference could be identified between IWOS-criteria diagnosed ocular sarcoidosis and suspected ocular sarcoidosis in terms of patient demographics, clinical course and visual outcomes.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×