Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
Efficacy of biologic agents in tubulointerstitial nephritis and uveitis
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Claire Noelle Hermsen
    Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
  • Dominic Co
    Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
  • Neil Paloian
    Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
  • Kelly Boyd
    Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
  • Laura J Kopplin
    Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Claire Hermsen None; Dominic Co None; Neil Paloian None; Kelly Boyd None; Laura Kopplin None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 2608. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Claire Noelle Hermsen, Dominic Co, Neil Paloian, Kelly Boyd, Laura J Kopplin; Efficacy of biologic agents in tubulointerstitial nephritis and uveitis. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):2608.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To characterize the clinical features and outcomes of patients with tubulointerstitial nephritis and uveitis (TINU) requiring treatment with biologic therapies.

Methods : The Wisconsin Ocular Inflammatory Disease research registry was queried from inception (4/2021) to 11/2023 to identify patients with TINU requiring use of biologic therapy. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatment course were assessed.

Results : Eight patients with TINU were identified. Median age at uveitis diagnosis was 13 years (9-50), 50% of patients were female. Uveitis subtypes included panuveitis (4 patients), anterior uveitis (3 patients) and anterior/intermediate uveitis (1 patient). Five patients were actively treated with adalimumab during the follow up interval and 1 had a prior history of adalimumab treatment; no other biologic therapies were used. Adalimumab treatment was more common in TINU patients with intermediate or panuveitis (5/6) than anterior uveitis (1/3). The anterior uveitis patient who required adalimumab had a clinical course complicated by bilateral optic disc edema unlike anterior uveitis patients treated without a biologic. Adalimumab therapy followed failure of mycophenolate mofetil (4 patients) or methotrexate (1 patient). Two patients required combination treatment with mycophenolate and adalimumab and one patient required weekly adalimumab dosing to obtain uveitis control; all patients on adalimumab treatment were able to fully wean systemic corticosteroids. Follow up is ongoing to determine recurrence of uveitis with ongoing adalimumab treatment and subsequent withdrawal.

Conclusions : Adalimumab is efficacious as a steroid sparing therapeutic in TINU patients with posterior segment uveitis recalcitrant to antimetabolite treatment.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×