Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
Comparison of objective and subjective driving exposure measurements in bioptic drivers
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Bradley E Dougherty
    The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
  • Rebecca Deffler
    The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
  • Elise Frazee
    The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
  • San-San Cooley
    The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Bradley Dougherty None; Rebecca Deffler None; Elise Frazee None; San-San Cooley None
  • Footnotes
    Support  Ohio Lions Eye Research Foundation Fellowship, Prevent Blindness Ohio Young Female Investigator Award, NIH T35 EY007151, NIH T32 EY034824
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 2589. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Bradley E Dougherty, Rebecca Deffler, Elise Frazee, San-San Cooley; Comparison of objective and subjective driving exposure measurements in bioptic drivers. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):2589.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : The purpose of this study was to compare self-reported estimates of driving exposure to objective estimates made using naturalistic recording devices in drivers with central vision impairment who use bioptic telescopic spectacles (BTS) to drive and normally-sighted controls. Estimates of driving exposure are useful for assessing the rate of collisions and associated factors.

Methods : Visual acuity was measured for each eye individually and through the BTS. Contrast sensitivity testing was performed with the Mars chart. Driving exposure and difficulty were assessed using the Driving Habits Questionnaire (Owsley et al.). A commercially available GPS tracking device (Azuga) was installed in the OBD-II port of drivers’ own cars. Drivers were monitored for a minimum of six weeks, and average weekly mileage and trips were calculated for the recording period. Driver characteristics and exposure were compared using Mann-Whitney U tests.

Results : Seventeen licensed drivers were enrolled (11 bioptic drivers with low vision and 6 normally-sighted control drivers). Bioptic drivers were older than controls (median (IQR) = 55 (15) years for bioptic drivers vs 47 (18.75) years for controls; P=0.02). Control drivers had better visual acuity (logMAR -0.08 (0.13)) than visually impaired drivers (logMAR 0.70 (.12) with carrier lenses, P<0.001). Log contrast sensitivity was worse in bioptic drivers (1.44 (0.28) vs 1.82 (0.06), P<0.001). Median objective weekly mileage for bioptic drivers over the observation period was 183 (207). There was no significant difference in objective weekly mileage between bioptic drivers and controls (P = 0.525). A strong correlation was observed between DHQ-reported average weekly mileage and average weekly mileage from the GPS tracking devices over six weeks (Spearman rho = 0.791, P = 0.004) for bioptic drivers.

Conclusions : Bioptic drivers’ objectively recorded mileage was about the same as that of normally-sighted control drivers, and there was a high correlation between subjective and objective estimates of exposure. These results suggest that exposure estimates for bioptic drivers obtained with the Driving Habits Questionnaire can be useful in studies of bioptic driving performance and safety.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×