Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
Evolution of Bipolar Cells
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Rikard Frederiksen
    UCLA Jules Stein Eye Institute, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Junqiang Wang
    UCLA Jules Stein Eye Institute, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Lin Zhang
    UCLA Jules Stein Eye Institute, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Martina Cavallini
    UCLA Jules Stein Eye Institute, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Ali Pahlevan
    UCLA Jules Stein Eye Institute, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Junwei Sun
    UCLA Jules Stein Eye Institute, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Ala Morshedian
    UCLA Jules Stein Eye Institute, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Alapakkam P Sampath
    UCLA Jules Stein Eye Institute, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Yi-Rong Peng
    UCLA Jules Stein Eye Institute, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Gordon Fain
    UCLA Jules Stein Eye Institute, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Rikard Frederiksen None; Junqiang Wang None; Lin Zhang None; Martina Cavallini None; Ali Pahlevan None; Junwei Sun None; Ala Morshedian None; Alapakkam Sampath None; Yi-Rong Peng None; Gordon Fain None
  • Footnotes
    Support  This work was supported by a career development award from Research to Prevent Blindness, a career starter award from Knights Templar Foundation, a Klingenstein-Simons Neuroscience Fellowship (Y.R.P.), NEI grants R01 EY001844 (G.L.F.) and R01 EY029817 (A.P.S.), a grant from the Great Lakes Fishery Commission (G.L.F.), and an unrestricted grant to the Department of Ophthalmology from Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 2190. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Rikard Frederiksen, Junqiang Wang, Lin Zhang, Martina Cavallini, Ali Pahlevan, Junwei Sun, Ala Morshedian, Alapakkam P Sampath, Yi-Rong Peng, Gordon Fain; Evolution of Bipolar Cells. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):2190.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose :
Rods evolved from cones; rod and cone bipolar cells must therefore have been initially similar, with ON and OFF cells synapsing directly onto ganglion cells. In mammals and teleost fishes, however, there are no OFF rod bipolar cells (RBCs), and ON RBCs synapse onto AII amacrine cells, which then convey the rod signals to cone bipolar cells and thence to ganglion cells. We attempt to explain how and when this transformation occurred.

Methods :
Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) was used to characterize retinal cell types in lamprey and to compare them to cell types in higher vertebrates (chicken, mouse, and macaque). Recordings from lamprey bipolar cells were made using patch-clamp in retinal slices.

Results :
scRNA-seq analysis of the adult lamprey retina obtained over 20,000 high-quality single-cell transcriptomes. An unsupervised clustering method was used to cluster all the cells into six main classes, as in all other vertebrates. From the BC class, there are three subclasses, RBCs, ON BCs, and OFF BCs, identified based on the expression patterns of canonical markers and synaptic receptor genes. The RBCs were further divided into two ON RBCs and one OFF RBC. One amacrine type had clear affinities to mammalian AII amacrines but did not express gap junctions. Single-cell recordings from lamprey retina identified an OFF RBC with spectral sensitivity nearly indistinguishable from rods. In backgrounds known to saturate rods, OFF RBCs were also saturated and did not respond to increment flashes.

Conclusions :
When cyclostomes split off from other vertebrates over 500 mya, lamprey progenitors had both ON and OFF rod bipolar cells and AII-like amacrine cells which did not however function like AII amacrines in mammals. Both rod and cone signals would have been processed in a similar fashion by direct input to ganglion cells. Since salamander and mudpuppy also have OFF RBCs, we think the processing of rod signals continued to occur via direct synapses onto ganglion cells up to the time of the split of amphibians from other vertebrates about 400 mya. At least some amphibians retained both ON and OFF RBCs, but OFF RBCs were gradually and independently lost in teleost fishes and mammals. AII-amacrine cells are very old but only later in evolution developed connections to rod and cone bipolar cells, forming the circuits that eventually replaced the more ancient system of direct synaptic contacts from both rod and cone bipolar cells to ganglion cells.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×