Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
Implanting Multifocal IOL following EDOF IOL Implantation Improves Near Visual Acuity While Maintaining Distance Visual Acuity and Intermediate Visual Acuity
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Sophia Dutton
    Aloha Vision Consultants, Honolulu, Hawaii, United States
  • Jason Tokunaga
    Aloha Vision Consultants, Honolulu, Hawaii, United States
  • Caitlin Yuen
    Aloha Vision Consultants, Honolulu, Hawaii, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Sophia Dutton None; Jason Tokunaga None; Caitlin Yuen None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 2070. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Sophia Dutton, Jason Tokunaga, Caitlin Yuen; Implanting Multifocal IOL following EDOF IOL Implantation Improves Near Visual Acuity While Maintaining Distance Visual Acuity and Intermediate Visual Acuity. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):2070.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : For patients who are not candidates for bilateral multifocal IOL or who chose EDOF (extended depth of focus) IOL (Symfony Optiblue) for their first eye, implanting a multifocal IOL (Tecnis Odyssey) in the second eye may be a method to achieve better near vision in those desiring improved reading without decreasing intermediate or distance vision.

Methods : 7 patients with bilateral cataracts implanted with Symfony Optiblue IOL who desired improved reading vision were implanted with Tecnis Odyssey IOL in their second eye and had visual acuities measured within a 60 day period. All eyes were targeted for plano. Visual acuities were measured at 6 m (distance), 60 cm (intermediate), and 40 cm (near) uncorrected, and best corrected for distance both unilaterally and bilaterally.

Results : For uncorrected DVA, Odyssey (20/20, LogMAR 0.012 ± 0.037) performed nearly as well as Symfony (20/20, LogMAR 0 ± 0), and bilaterally, remained at 20/20 (LogMAR 0.014 ± 0.037). Similarly, for IVA, Odyssey (20/20, LogMAR 0.001 ± 0.115) performed nearly as well as Symfony (20/20, LogMAR -0.014 ± 0.067), and bilaterally, improved to 20/15 (LogMAR -0.097 ± 0). For NVA, Odyssey (20/25, LogMAR 0.124 ± 0.093) performed better than Symfony (20/30, LogMAR 0.200 ± 0.0845). Bilaterally, NVA improved to 20/20 (LogMAR 0.039 ± 0.070).

Best corrected DVA remained at 20/20 for Odyssey (LogMAR 0 ± 0), Symfony (LogMAR -0.031 ± 0.081), and bilaterally (LogMAR -0.31 ± 0.081). Best corrected IVA remained at 20/20 for Odyssey (LogMAR -0.55 ± 0.052), improved to 20/15 for Symfony (LogMAR -0.086 ± 0.092), and bilaterally remained at 20/15 (LogMAR -0.114 ± 0.072). Best corrected NVA remained at 20/20 for Odyssey (LogMAR 0.039 ± 0.07) and improved to 20/25 for Symfony (LogMAR 0.128 ± 0.126), and bilaterally remained at 20/20 (LogMAR 0.277 ± 0.047).

Conclusions : EDOF IOLs are generally believed to provide improved distance and intermediate vision compared to multifocal IOLs. Despite this, Odyssey may be comparable to Symfony in terms of distance and intermediate vision. Additionally, Odyssey provides an increase in near vision acuity. This suggests that patients who are not a candidate for bilateral multifocal implantation or desire improved near vision after implantation of Symfony may achieve this with an Odyssey IOL in their second eye.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×