Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
Comparison of machine learning models to predict non-adherence to annual diabetic eye disease testing using clinical variables from electronic health records at an integrated healthcare system
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Jane Huang
    Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
  • Ahmed Sabit
    Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
  • Jiangxia Wang
    Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
  • Alvin Liu
    Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Jane Huang None; Ahmed Sabit None; Jiangxia Wang None; Alvin Liu None
  • Footnotes
    Support  Research to Prevent Blindness Career Development Award
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 3765. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Jane Huang, Ahmed Sabit, Jiangxia Wang, Alvin Liu; Comparison of machine learning models to predict non-adherence to annual diabetic eye disease testing using clinical variables from electronic health records at an integrated healthcare system. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):3765.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To develop and compare machine learning models that can predict and identify patients at risk of being non-adherent to annual diabetic eye disease (DED) testing.

Methods : We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional study of all patients with diabetes mellitus managed across 30+ primary care sites at Johns Hopkins Medicine in the calendar year 2021. Collected patient data included age, race, ethnicity, language, sex, insurance type, national area deprivation index (ADI), inflation-adjusted median household income, and primary care clinic site type. A higher ADI score indicates more socioeconomic disadvantage. Primary care clinic site type was categorized based on whether autonomous artificial intelligence (AI) testing (IDx-DR, Digital Diagnostics, Coralville, IA) for DED was available or not. The primary outcome measure was adherence to DED testing by the end of the calendar year. Several machine learning models including random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), XGBoost (XGB), and logistic regression (LR) were trained using the aforementioned patient variables. The data was portioned at the patient level: 80% training and 20% testing. A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results : A total of 17,590 patients were included. The four machine learning algorithms had high sensitivities in predicting non-adherent patients: 86% (RF), 99% (SVM), 70% (XGB), and 80% (LR). The top two predictive patient factors of non-adherence in both the RF and LR models were younger age and receiving care at a clinic site without AI implementation. In the XGB model, younger age and higher inflation-adjusted median household income were the two top predictors.

Conclusions : Using data from a large cohort of patients with diabetes managed at an integrated healthcare system, we were able to train several machine learning models to predict non-adherence to annual DED testing in a given calendar year. Of the 4 models, SVM achieved the highest sensitivity of 99%. Of note, in two of the four models, being managed at a primary care site without autonomous AI was one of the two top predictors of patient non-adherence.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×