Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
Swinging Flashlight versus Virtual Reality-Swinging Flashlight Detection of Reactive Afferent Pupil Defect
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Erin Elaine Guerra
    The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston School of Medicine, Galveston, Texas, United States
  • Prithul Sarker
    Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Nevada Reno, Reno, Nevada, United States
  • Lillian Tia
    The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston School of Medicine, Galveston, Texas, United States
  • Elioenai Garcia
    The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston School of Medicine, Galveston, Texas, United States
  • Phillip Keys
    The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston School of Medicine, Galveston, Texas, United States
  • Kevin Merkley
    The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston School of Medicine, Galveston, Texas, United States
  • Nasif Zaman
    Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Nevada Reno, Reno, Nevada, United States
  • Stewart Zuckerbrod
    The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston School of Medicine, Galveston, Texas, United States
  • Alireza Tavakkoli
    Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Nevada Reno, Reno, Nevada, United States
  • Praveena K Gupta
    The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston School of Medicine, Galveston, Texas, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Erin Guerra None; Prithul Sarker None; Lillian Tia None; Elioenai Garcia None; Phillip Keys None; Kevin Merkley None; Nasif Zaman None; Stewart Zuckerbrod None; Alireza Tavakkoli Eyesight Quest LLC, Code O (Owner); Praveena Gupta None
  • Footnotes
    Support  Roberston Poth Endowment
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 3736. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Erin Elaine Guerra, Prithul Sarker, Lillian Tia, Elioenai Garcia, Phillip Keys, Kevin Merkley, Nasif Zaman, Stewart Zuckerbrod, Alireza Tavakkoli, Praveena K Gupta; Swinging Flashlight versus Virtual Reality-Swinging Flashlight Detection of Reactive Afferent Pupil Defect. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):3736.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : The swinging flashlight test (SFT) is a critical part of the ophthalmologic exam to detect relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD). However, it often misses afferent pupillary defects due to poor execution and subjective qualitative interpretation. The purpose of this study is to test SFT versus a novel virtual reality swinging flashlight test (VR-SFT) in detecting RAPD in routine eye exams.

Methods : A total of 69 participants consented to participate in the study following the guidelines of the University of Texas Medical Branch’s review board for working with human subjects. Subjects were analyzed for RAPD by certified ophthalmic staff and tested with the Zuckkoli Afferent Pupillary Device (“ZAP” ™) VR headset for eye tracking. The test comprised of four protocols, each tailored with multiple illumination sequences and durations, demonstrating flexibility and adaptability to virtual reality constraints. The study involved manipulating luminance levels to simulate the effects of neutral density filters and adjusting target size to mitigate accommodative responses. A RAPD score was calculated using a linear relationship between the pupillary contraction amplitude/pupil diameter and the difference of light amount for each eye. RAPD scores outside of -0.3 and 0.3 were considered positive for RAPD.

Results : Patients recruited for the study were predominantly women (66.67%), Caucasian (75%), and had a mean age of 50.59 years (SD = 17.5). SFT detected RAPD in 2 subjects and the VR-SFT detected RAPD in 9 subjects out of the 69 who received routine screening. Both systems detected RAPD in 2 of the subjects. These RAPD-positive subjects had history of ocular pathologies and average RAPD scores as follows: empty sella syndrome with a score of 0.30 (OD), macular scar with a score of -0.31 (OS), branch retinal artery occlusion with a score of 0.38 (OD), and open angle glaucoma with a score of -1.65 (OS). Further investigation indicated the subject with open angle glaucoma had progressive nerve fiber layer thinning contributing to RAPD.

Conclusions : The “ZAP” ™ VR system reliably detected RAPD and was more sensitive in detecting RAPD compared to SFT. The VR-SFT provided an objective RAPD score grading the severity of the RAPD, thus may be used in the future for managing disease progression. However, studies with ocular pathologies in larger numbers need to be done for further validation.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×