Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
Treatment of Ocular Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Emma Terwilliger
    Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research, Phoenix, Arizona, United States
  • Hunter Stearns
    Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research, Phoenix, Arizona, United States
  • Yul Yang
    Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research, Phoenix, Arizona, United States
  • Aaron Mangold
    Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research, Phoenix, Arizona, United States
  • Joanne F Shen
    Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research, Phoenix, Arizona, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Emma Terwilliger None; Hunter Stearns None; Yul Yang None; Aaron Mangold None; Joanne Shen None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 3627. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Emma Terwilliger, Hunter Stearns, Yul Yang, Aaron Mangold, Joanne F Shen; Treatment of Ocular Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):3627.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To analyze ophthalmic and systemic treatments for ocular mucous membrane pemphigoid (OMMP).

Methods : IRB approved retrospective chart review was performed on 70 patients identified by Epic SlicerDicer at Mayo Clinic in Arizona using the ICD-10 code L12.1 (ocular mucous membrane pemphigoid) on 8/30/23. Patients were excluded if they had no ocular involvement. These patients were seen by a single cornea specialist in a referral practice and treated in collaboration with the Dermatology department. Demographics, clinical exam, medication treatments were extracted.

Results : 39 patients who established Opthalmology care between 05/05/08 and 08/21/23 were included in the study with biopsy, serum, or clinical diangosis of OMMP. The mean age of diagnosis was 70, with 66% female patients. Of these patients, 5.1% were Foster Stage I, 25.6% were Stage II, 59% were Stage III, and 10.3% were Stage IV. Ophthalmic treatments included: trichiasis epilation (87%), serum tears (41%), moisture chambers (44%), and punctal cautery (15%). Dermatology implemented immune suppression treatments including: rituximab (79%), oral prednisone (56%), intravenous immunoglobulin (38.5%), mycophenolate mofetil (31%), dapsone (15%), azathioprine (10%), doxycycline (8%) and cyclophosphamide (3%). Six patients have noted progression of disease or current signs of inflammation.

Conclusions : There is no current currative treatment for OMMP, rather agents are used to stabilize the disease course from progressing. Although biological agents have been mentioned as a new potential for OMMP treatment, there is limited data for its use outside of severe or refractory disease. At our center, rituximab and IVIG are used as first line therapy for most patients. Future studies will determine the efficacy and safety of this treatment over past conventional treatment protocols.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×