June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
Differences in individual VF-14 scores between AMD and other impairments
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Severina Ferreira-Lopes
    Psychology, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • Aaron Johnson
    Psychology, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    Centre de readaptation MAB-Mackay, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Severina Ferreira-Lopes None; Aaron Johnson None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 3336. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Severina Ferreira-Lopes, Aaron Johnson; Differences in individual VF-14 scores between AMD and other impairments. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):3336.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : The Visual Function Index (VF-14) is a questionnaire designed to measure impairment in visual function (Steinberg et al., 1994). Although created for patients with cataracts, it has also been validated for other conditions (e.g., age-related macular degeneration (AMD); Mackenzie et al., 2002). Typically, only the total VF-14 score is reported by researchers. Here, we explored if there are differences between AMD and other sources of vision impairment in total and individual scores on the VF-14.

Methods : Using archival data from the Montreal Barriers Study, and data from the ongoing Concordia Retina Image Database, a sample of 371 individuals with AMD and 452 with other conditions were analyzed. VF-14 was administered at hospitals and rehabilitation service sites in the greater Montreal region.

Results : For total VF-14 score, we find no differences between the two groups (p=.568, d=.07) and across most conditions. However, we find that those with AMD perform worse on question 1 – reading small print (p=.008, d=.19) and question 10 – playing sports (p=.009, d=.261). We also find that those with other vision loss conditions score statistically significantly lower on question 11 – cooking (p=.04, d=-.16). Given that AMD primarily impacts the function of the fovea, the observed difficulties for those with AMD in tasks involving reading small print and playing sports requiring hand-eye coordination of small objects are not unexpected. Alternatively, our results regarding cooking were initially unanticipated. However, cooking requires having comprehensive spatial awareness and the ability to track surroundings while finding ingredients, which would be impacted by peripheral damage, rather than damage to the central vision.

Conclusions : These results demonstrate that looking at the overall total score of the VF-14 may not be as informative as looking at the individual question scores, suggesting that individual scores should also be considered when analyzing VF-14 in research.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×