Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
Influence of Different Display Font and Background Color Combinations on Visual Functions and Subjective Perception
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Josefine Dolata
    Ernst-Abbe-Hochschule Jena, Jena, Thüringen, Germany
  • Anne Mingers
    Ernst-Abbe-Hochschule Jena, Jena, Thüringen, Germany
  • Philipp Hessler
    Ernst-Abbe-Hochschule Jena, Jena, Thüringen, Germany
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Josefine Dolata None; Anne Mingers None; Philipp Hessler Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH, Code C (Consultant/Contractor)
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 3082. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Josefine Dolata, Anne Mingers, Philipp Hessler; Influence of Different Display Font and Background Color Combinations on Visual Functions and Subjective Perception. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):3082.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Dynamic display colors, such as inverse display, have achieved importance in the use of digital devices to support the circadian rhythm. The aim of this study was to find the most appropriate combination of font and background color for different age groups with regard to the parameters lag of accommodation, visual acuity and subjective perception.

Methods : In right eyes of 33 non-presbyopic (24.1 ± 3.4 years) and 17 early presbyopic subjects (42.0 ± 3.0 years), visual acuity was determined at 40 cm (Smartphone GALAXY A3, SAMSUNG) with the Freiburg Visual Acuity and Contrast Test (FrACT) and accommodation with an open-field-autorefractometer (WAM 5500, GRAND SEIKO) for six font and background color combinations (blue on white, white on blue, blue on black, black on blue, black on white, and white on black). The subjective perception was evaluated by a questionnaire.

Results : The lag of accommodation of non-presbyopic subjects was significantly higher for black on blue (1.44 ± 0.33 D) and blue on black (1.38 ± 0.36 D) compared with blue on white (1.06 ± 0.26 D, p = .000), white on blue (1.07 ± 0.32 D, p = .000), black on white (1.09 ± 0.23 D, p = .000), and white on black (1.04 ± 0.25 D, p = .000). The early presbyopic subjects (presb.) showed a significantly higher lag of accommodation for black on blue (1.56 ± 0.36 D) compared with blue on white (1.40 ± 0.40 D, p = .002), white on blue (1.49 ± 0.44 D, p = .050), black on white (1.39 ± 0.46 D, p = .008), and white on black (1.45 ± 0.35 D, p = .001). In both subject groups, blue on black (0.18 ± 0.09 logMAR, presb.: 0.21 ± 0.08 logMAR) and black on blue (0.12 ± 0.08 logMAR, presb.: 0.20 ± 0.09 logMAR) showed a significant reduction of visual acuity (p < 0.05). The color combinations white on black, blue on white and black on white were most preferred in relation to sense of well-being, reading fluency and sharpness.

Conclusions : The color combinations blue on black and black on blue showed a higher lag of accommodation. Subjectively, no preference for these color combinations could be determined in terms of well-being, reading fluency and sharpness. However, non-presbyopic test subjects in particular would prefer an inverse display with white on black to the classic black on white display.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×