Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
A Split-Face Comparison between Onabotulinumtoxin A and Prabotulinumtoxin A in the treatment of Glabellar Frown Lines
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Rasika Sudharshan
    University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Preeya Mehta
    NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, United States
  • Leslie Pfeiffer
    Key-Whitman Eye Center, California, United States
  • David Samimi
    University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Sandy Zhang-Nunes
    University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Rasika Sudharshan None; Preeya Mehta None; Leslie Pfeiffer None; David Samimi None; Sandy Zhang-Nunes None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 3044. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Rasika Sudharshan, Preeya Mehta, Leslie Pfeiffer, David Samimi, Sandy Zhang-Nunes; A Split-Face Comparison between Onabotulinumtoxin A and Prabotulinumtoxin A in the treatment of Glabellar Frown Lines. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):3044.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : There are many formulations of botulinumtoxinA (BoNT-A) that are used widely for cosmetic procedures. PrabotulinumtoxinA is one of the newer commercially available formulations of BoNT-A. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy, safety, and duration of prabotulinumtoxinA in comparison to onabotulinumtoxinA in a split-face clinical trial. Comparison of OnabotulinumtoxinA and Prabotulinumtoxin was performed to evaluate for a difference in efficacy, duration, and safety in the treatment of glabellar frown lines.

Methods :
A prospective, split-face, double-blinded randomized trial was performed to investigate the noninferiority of OnabotulinumtoxinA and PrabotulinumtoxinA. Twenty-two patients were randomized, with one side of the glabella receiving 8-10 units of OnabotulinumtoxinA and the other receiving 8-10 units of PrabotulinumtoxinA. Patients were surveyed regarding adverse events, day of onset, effectiveness at 3 weeks, and day of offset for each side. At 3 weeks, the injector evaluated effectiveness. Pre- and post-treatment photos at rest and maximal frown were graded by two masked oculoplastic surgeons on a validated five-point Merz scale. A Wilcoxon signed rank test was used for statistical analysis (α < 0.05).

Results : No statistical difference was seen in adverse events (pain, bruising, and headache) as well as days to onset, days to offset, and duration. There was no difference in effectiveness at three weeks as graded by the patient and injector. On the Merz scale, a statistically significant difference was seen (p < 0.05) for both OnabotulinumtoxinA and PrabotulinumtoxinA in their pre and post treatment scores, but there was no statistically significant difference found between the two toxins when comparing change of Merz scores (p > 0.05). The interrater reliability between the two Oculofacial Plastic Surgeons who graded the photographs at baseline and 3 weeks was calculated to be 87%.

Conclusions : No difference was seen between the two neurotoxins in effectiveness of treating glabellar lines, as well as in duration and safety. OnabotulinumtoxinA and PrabotulinumtoxinA are both effective in treating glabellar lines at frown and rest when evaluated three weeks post treatment at a total dose of 16-20 units of neurotoxin.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×