Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
Comparison of Retinal Thickness Measurements among Four Different Optical Coherence Tomography Devices
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Ki Tae Nam
    College of medicine, Jeju National University, Jeju-si, Jeju-do, Korea (the Republic of)
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Ki Tae Nam None
  • Footnotes
    Support  none
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 4842. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Ki Tae Nam; Comparison of Retinal Thickness Measurements among Four Different Optical Coherence Tomography Devices. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):4842.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : We sought to compare the retinal thickness measurements collected using different optical coherence tomography (OCT) devices.

Methods : This prospective study included 21 healthy cases, and the retinal thickness was measured using the PLEX Elite (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, California, USA), DRI OCT-1 Atlantis (Topcon Corp, Tokyo, Japan), Cirrus 5000 HD-OCT (Carl Zeiss Meditec), and Spectralis OCT (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany), respectively. The mean central retinal thickness (CRT) and mean retinal thickness of the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) area were compared.

Results : The CRT varied significantly among the different OCT devices (P < 0.001). Post-hoc analysis revealed that the CRT measured using PLEX Elite (278.95 ± 20.04 µm) and Spectralis (271.86 ± 17.92 µm) were similar, and both were greater than the CRT measurements of DRI OCT-1 (239.57 ± 21.06 µm) and Cirrus (256.76 ± 17.82 µm). Additionally, the mean retinal thickness in each ETDRS area showed significant differences among the four devices (all P < 0.001).

Conclusions : The mean retinal thickness measured varied according to the device used, and this needs to be considered when comparing retinal thickness measurements taken with different devices.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×