Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
Comparison of visual field fluctuation between myopic and emmetropic glaucoma patients
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Molly Barten
    Department of Ophthalmology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
  • Louis Cantor
    Department of Ophthalmology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Molly Barten None; Louis Cantor Zeiss Meditec, Code C (Consultant/Contractor)
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIH T-35EY031282
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 4799. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Molly Barten, Louis Cantor; Comparison of visual field fluctuation between myopic and emmetropic glaucoma patients. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):4799.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Conflicting epidemiologic studies suggest that myopia may both increase and decrease the risk of glaucomatous visual field loss. To provide appropriate treatment to glaucoma patients, it is important to detect meaningful changes in the visual field, which requires distinguishing between visual field fluctuation and progression. Long-term visual field fluctuation is defined as the variability between two visual field tests performed on separate days on the same eye that cannot be attributed to a pathologic change. We performed a retrospective, observational clinical study to test the hypothesis that myopic glaucoma patients demonstrate more long-term visual field fluctuation than emmetropic glaucoma patients.

Methods : Four or more 24-2 or 30-2 Humphrey visual field tests over several clinic visits were analyzed in 156 patients. Data including the visual field index (VFI) plot, mean deviation (MD), and threshold sensitivity on the glaucoma progression analysis were collected to quantify fluctuation. The sample was divided into two groups: 1. emmetropic glaucoma patients with a spherical equivalent refraction between +2 to -2 diopters and 2. high myopic glaucoma patients with a spherical equivalent refraction over -5 diopters. Within-patient within-eye fluctuation was calculated using root mean square error (RMSE).

Results : RMSE testing between 78 myopic glaucoma patients and 78 emmetropic glaucoma patients found that myopic glaucoma patients demonstrated significant fluctuation for MD (p=0.006) and VFI (p=0.035). Although myopic patients showed greater fluctuation for MD (1.504±1.016, SEM=0.115) and VFI (0.037±0.045, SEM=0.005) compared to emmetropic glaucoma patients (MD = 1.125±0.652, SEM=0.074) (VFI=0.026±0.019, SEM=0.002), threshold sensitivity analyses did not reach statistically significant differences (p=0.054) between myopic (1.609±1.022, SEM=0.116) and emmetropic glaucoma patients (1.339±0.687, SEM =0.078). Additional statistical tests will be presented.

Conclusions : The results for MD and VFI are consitent with the hypothesis that myopic patients demonstrate more visual field fluctuation than emmetropic glaucoma patients. Therefore, clinicians should incorporate more frequent visual field tests and a thorough examination of clinical findings such as optic nerve appearance, retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, and intraocular pressure to guide clinical decision making for myopic glaucoma patients.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×