Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
Measuring individual perimetric variability in glaucoma
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Andrew Turpin
    Lions Eye Institute, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
    Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
  • Vanessa Tang
    Lions Eye Institute, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
  • William H Morgan
    Lions Eye Institute, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
  • Allison M McKendrick
    Lions Eye Institute, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
    Optometry, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Andrew Turpin CenterVue Italy, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), iCare, Finland, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Johnson & Johnson Vision, USA, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), CrewT Medical, Japan, Code F (Financial Support), Heidelberg Engineering, Germany, Code F (Financial Support); Vanessa Tang None; William Morgan None; Allison McKendrick CenterVue Italy, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), iCare, Finland, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Johnson & Johnson Vision, USA, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), CrewT Medical, Japan, Code F (Financial Support), Heidelberg Engineering, Germany, Code F (Financial Support)
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 4796. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Andrew Turpin, Vanessa Tang, William H Morgan, Allison M McKendrick; Measuring individual perimetric variability in glaucoma. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):4796.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : We have previously shown [1] using computer simulation that the Ψ algorithm [2] could be used in a clinical setting for determining whether a Frequency of Seeing curve (FoS) is steep or flat. Here we investigate the performance of Ψ in patients with moderate to advanced glaucoma.

Methods : 19 patients (MD mean -5.08 dB range [-14.72, -1.72]) were tested in 3 locations of their visual field with Ψ during a visit for the IPPOS clinical trial [3]. The locations were chosen by author VT to be spatially separated and in previously measured normal areas of the VF. Ψ used a domain of thresholds 20 to 40 dB, slopes of 1 to 5 dB (standard deviation of Cumulative Gaussian) and 5 possible values for the asymptotes of the FoS curve ranging from 0 to 20%. The procedure ran for 27 presentations at each location using the OPI [4] interface to the Compass perimeter (CenterVue, Italy). Patients also underwent a standard 24-2 VF test on the Compass perimeter (Zest Faster). Locations that measured close to the floor of the range in Ψ (<22 dB) were discarded from the analysis.

Threshold measurements were compared between Ψ and Zest Faster. Slopes are reported and compared with thresholds and with previous models of the slope-threshold relationship [5].

Results : 34 locations in 17 eyes were analysed. The mean difference between the Ψ and Zest Faster thresholds was -0.76 dB (sd 3.14, mean-abs 2.24, range [0.06, 9.00]). A least-squares log-linear fit shows slope = exp(2.55 - 0.061 * threshold) (both parameters t-test p < 0.02). This is similar to the Henson et al formula [5] of slope = exp(3.27 - 0.081 * threshold). While on average the slopes followed Henson et al, there was substantial deviation from the average for any individual. Steep slopes (near 1.0) were present across the range of thresholds from 25 dB to 36 dB. 5 of the 17 eyes had all slopes below 2.

Conclusions : The average relationship between threshold and slope measured clinically using Ψ follows known patterns. However, 5 of the 17 eyes showed steep slopes well below population average [5]. These eyes are candidates for the application of tighter criteria for calling glaucomatous progression, allowing earlier detection of progression if progression is present [6].

[1] Turpin et al. 2010 Vis Res 50
[2] Kontsevich et al. 1999 Vis Res 39
[3] IPPOS Trial. https://tinyurl.com/mwchf89j
[4] Turpin et al. 2012 J Vis 12
[5] Henson et al. 2000 IOVS 41
[6] Turpin et al. 2005 Vis Res 45

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×