Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
3D Bioprinting of Cornea Mimetic Lenticules: Comparing pneumatic extrusion and digital light processing (DLP) methods
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Parinita Agrawal
    Pandorum Technologies Pvt Ltd, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
  • Suvro Kanti Chowdhury
    Pandorum Technologies Pvt Ltd, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
  • Neha Waghmare
    Pandorum Technologies Pvt Ltd, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
  • Namit Dey
    Pandorum Technologies Pvt Ltd, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
  • Rita Das Mahapatra
    Pandorum Technologies Pvt Ltd, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
  • Utkarsh Bhutani
    Pandorum Technologies Pvt Ltd, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
  • Kamalnath Selvakumar
    Pandorum Technologies Pvt Ltd, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
  • Anil Tiwari
    Dr Shroff's Charity Eye Hospital Delhi, New Delhi, Delhi, India
  • Abha Gour
    Dr Shroff's Charity Eye Hospital Delhi, New Delhi, Delhi, India
  • Mehak Vohra
    Pandorum Technologies Pvt Ltd, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
  • Virender Singh Sangwan
    Dr Shroff's Charity Eye Hospital Delhi, New Delhi, Delhi, India
  • Tuhin Bhowmick
    Pandorum Technologies Pvt Ltd, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
  • Arun Chandru
    Pandorum Technologies Pvt Ltd, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Parinita Agrawal None; Suvro Chowdhury None; Neha Waghmare None; Namit Dey None; Rita Mahapatra None; Utkarsh Bhutani None; Kamalnath Selvakumar None; Anil Tiwari None; Abha Gour None; Mehak Vohra None; Virender Singh Sangwan None; Tuhin Bhowmick None; Arun Chandru None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 4473. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Parinita Agrawal, Suvro Kanti Chowdhury, Neha Waghmare, Namit Dey, Rita Das Mahapatra, Utkarsh Bhutani, Kamalnath Selvakumar, Anil Tiwari, Abha Gour, Mehak Vohra, Virender Singh Sangwan, Tuhin Bhowmick, Arun Chandru; 3D Bioprinting of Cornea Mimetic Lenticules: Comparing pneumatic extrusion and digital light processing (DLP) methods. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):4473.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : Worldwide 28 million people are affected by corneal blindness and there is only 1 donor cornea tissue available among 70 in the waiting list. The disadvantages of corneal transplantation have necessitated development of engineered cornea, where the three-dimensional (3D) bioprinted products hold immense potential. The advancement in 3D-bioprinting field has led to multiple techniques which provide different levels of success in producing a cornea lenticule mimicking several aspects of native cornea.

Methods : We produced cornea lenticule using two unique bioprinting techniques, extrusion and digital light processing (DLP). The study covers a comparative evaluation of the bioink, process parameters and properties of the bioprinted lenticule. The bioprinted cornea lenticules were evaluated via various physico-chemical characterization involving light transmittance, mechanical stability, and in-vitro studies like epithelialization support, viability and phenotypic evaluation with human corneal stromal cells.

Results : Viscosity of the bioink played a pivotal role in printability of the lenticules in extrusion based bioprinting, whereas in DLP, the process parameters like layer height, exposure time and photo-crosslinker were the key factors. Extrusion based printing required a support bed for printing and resolution of 200 µm, while the DLP provided better resolution (50 µm precision). Optimizing various parameters, we obtained lenticules with cornea mimetic properties, with 85% or more transparency, less than 30% swelling and modulus matching the native cornea stroma. The bioinks and bioprinting process were also compatible with corneal epithelial and stromal cells.

Conclusions : We studied extrusion and DLP techniques to bioprint human cornea mimetic lenticule, which can be applied in sutureless manner. The overall resolution of DLP printed lenticules were better, yet the technique requires more comprehensive hold over the parameters.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×