Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
Attitudes to Gene Therapy for the Eye – A Global Survey
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Lauren N Ayton
    Optometry and Vision Sciences, and Surgery (Ophthalmology), The University of Melbourne Faculty of Medicine Dentistry and Health Sciences, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    Centre for Eye Research Australia Ltd, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • Myra Mcguinness
    Centre for Eye Research Australia Ltd, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    Surgery (Ophthalmology), The University of Melbourne Faculty of Medicine Dentistry and Health Sciences, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • Fred Chen
    Centre for Ophthalmology and Visual Science, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
  • John R Grigg
    The University of Sydney Save Sight Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  • Heather G Mack
    Centre for Eye Research Australia Ltd, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    Surgery (Ophthalmology), The University of Melbourne Faculty of Medicine Dentistry and Health Sciences, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • Alexis Ceecee Britten-Jones
    Optometry and Vision Sciences, and Surgery (Ophthalmology), The University of Melbourne Faculty of Medicine Dentistry and Health Sciences, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    Centre for Eye Research Australia Ltd, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Lauren Ayton Kiora Pharmaceuticals, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Novartis, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Apellis, Code C (Consultant/Contractor); Myra Mcguinness None; Fred Chen None; John Grigg Janssen, Belite, Novartis, Nacuity, Code C (Consultant/Contractor); Heather Mack None; Alexis Ceecee Britten-Jones None
  • Footnotes
    Support  National Health and Medical Research Council Investigator grant (LNA), Retina Australia Research Grant (HGM, FKC, JRG, LNA), Melbourne Postdoctoral Fellowship (ACBJ), University of Melbourne Early Career Research Project (ACBJ). CERA receives operational infrastructure support from the Victorian state government.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 4322. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Lauren N Ayton, Myra Mcguinness, Fred Chen, John R Grigg, Heather G Mack, Alexis Ceecee Britten-Jones; Attitudes to Gene Therapy for the Eye – A Global Survey. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):4322.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : With one regulatory-approved gene therapy for RPE65-associated retinal degeneration, and several others in the pipeline, it is important to understand potential recipients’ perspectives on these treatments, interest in uptake, and barriers to access. This survey aimed to capture current attitudes to ocular gene therapy in a global cohort of people with inherited retinal disease (IRD).

Methods : An online survey was distributed to adults with an IRD and parents/carers of those affected. The survey included demographic data and the Attitudes to Gene Therapy-Eye (AGT-Eye), EQ-5D-5L, National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ-25), and Patient Attitudes to Clinical Trials (PACT-22) instruments. Data was then compared to previously published Australian data from our group (n=694).

Results : Between 13 April and 25 July 2023, 496 participants completed the survey (89% adults with IRDs, mean age 55.6 [standard deviation: 14.4] years, 11% parents/guardians/carers, mean age 45.3 [11.0] years). Gender was equal between respondents overall (52% female), but more female parents/carers participated than male parents (69%). Respondents were from 35 countries, with most from the United States of America (USA; 69%) and United Kingdom (11%). Most participants (90%) indicated they would likely accept gene therapy if it was available to them or family members, but less than half (45%) felt that they had a good understanding of the technology. The main sources of information were research registries (60% participants) and the internet (61%). When compared to previous Australian data, we found that the USA respondents had a higher self-rated knowledge of ocular gene therapy, but reported lower perceived value of therapy scores.

Conclusions : This expansion to a previously published study in Australians with IRDs has provided further evidence that people with IRDs are highly motivated to access gene therapy. In the global cohort, representing over 35 countries, most respondents had highly positive views about gene therapy, and identified limited barriers for uptake. Further education is required for patients with IRDs in order to prepare them for the emerging treatments.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×