Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
Validating a Confirmatory Structure-Function Model Prognostic of Progression of Intermediate AMD: MACUSTAR Study Primary Endpoint Analysis
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Charlotte Behning
    Institute of Medical Biometry, Informatics and Epidemiology, Universitatsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
  • Jan Henrik Terheyden
    Department of Ophthalmology, Universitatsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
    Department of Optometry and Visual Sciences, City University of London, London, London, United Kingdom
  • Robert Finger
    Department of Ophthalmology, Universitatsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
    Department of Ophthalmology, Universitatsklinikum Mannheim, Mannheim, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
  • Hannah M P Dunbar
    UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London Faculty of Medical Sciences, London, United Kingdom
    Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, London, United Kingdom
  • Marlene Sassmannshausen
    Department of Ophthalmology, Universitatsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
  • Adnan Tufail
    Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, London, United Kingdom
  • David P. Crabb
    Department of Optometry and Visual Sciences, City University of London, London, London, United Kingdom
  • Alison M Binns
    Department of Optometry and Visual Sciences, City University of London, London, London, United Kingdom
  • Zhichao Wu
    Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital Ronald Lowe Library, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • Robyn H Guymer
    Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital Ronald Lowe Library, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
    Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • Nadia Zakaria
    Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
  • Sergio Leal
    Bayer Consumer Care AG, Basel, Basel-Stadt, Switzerland
  • Steffen Schmitz-Valckenberg
    Department of Ophthalmology, Universitatsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
    John A. Moran Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
  • Ulrich F O Luhmann
    Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Translational Medicine Ophthalmology, F Hoffmann-La Roche AG Research and Development Division, Basel, Basel-Stadt, Switzerland
  • Matthias Schmid
    Institute of Medical Biometry, Informatics and Epidemiology, Universitatsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
  • Frank G Holz
    Department of Ophthalmology, Universitatsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Charlotte Behning None; Jan Terheyden Carl Zeiss MediTec AG, CenterVue, Heidelberg Engineering, Code F (Financial Support), Novartis, Okko, Code R (Recipient); Robert Finger Alimera, Apellis, Bayer, Böhringer-Ingelheim, Novartis, ODOS, Oxford Innovation, ProGenerika, Roche/Genentech, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Biogen, CentreVue (now Icare), Heidelberg Engineering, Zeiss Meditec, Code F (Financial Support); Hannah Dunbar Böhringer Ingelheim, Code C (Consultant/Contractor); Marlene Sassmannshausen Heidelberg Engineering, CenterVue, Carl Zeiss MediTec, Code F (Financial Support); Adnan Tufail Allergan, Allegro, Adverum, Annexonm Apellis, Bayer, Genetech, Heidelberg Engineering, Iveric Bio, Kanghong Pharmaceutical, Kodiak Sciences, Novartis, Oxurion, Roche, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Bayer, Novartis, Code F (Financial Support); David Crabb AbbVie/Allergan, Apellis, , Code C (Consultant/Contractor), AbbVie/Allergan, Apellis, Janssen, Code F (Financial Support), AbbVie/Allergan, Glaukos, Santen, Thea, Code R (Recipient); Alison Binns Apparatus and method for retinal measurement: Patent number: 9492081; 2016, Code P (Patent); Zhichao Wu None; Robyn Guymer Roche Genentech, Apellis, Novartis, Bayer, Belite, AbbVie, Janssen, Code C (Consultant/Contractor); Nadia Zakaria Employee of Novartis, Code E (Employment); Sergio Leal Employee of BAYER AG, Code E (Employment); Steffen Schmitz-Valckenberg AlphaRET, Apellis, Bioeq, Galimedix, Katairo, Kubota Vision, Novartis, Perceive Biotherapeutics, Pixium, Roche, SparingVision, Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Bayer, Carl Zeiss MediTec, Heidelberg Engineering, Novartis, Roche, Code F (Financial Support), Apellis, Heidelberg Engineering, Code R (Recipient); Ulrich Luhmann Employee of F.Hoffmann La Roche Ltd, Code E (Employment), F.Hoffmann La Roche Ltd, Code I (Personal Financial Interest); Matthias Schmid None; Frank Holz Acucela, Alexion, Alzheon, Apellis, Astellas, Bayer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bioeq/Formycon, Roche/Genentech, Geuder, Graybug, Gyroscope, Heidelberg Engineering, IvericBio, Janssen, Kanghong, LinBioscience, Novartis, Oxurion, Pixium Vision, Oxurion, Stealth BioTherapeutics, Zeiss , Code C (Consultant/Contractor), Acucela, Allergan, Apellis, Bayer, Bioeq/Formycon, CenterVue, Roche/Genentech, Geude , Heidelberg Engineering, IvericBio, Kanghong, NightStarX, Novartis, Optos, Pixium Vision, Zeiss , Code F (Financial Support), GRADE Reading Center Bonn, Code O (Owner)
  • Footnotes
    Support  This project has received funding from the Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking under grant agreement No 116076. This Joint Undertaking receives support from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program and EFPIA
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 4314. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Charlotte Behning, Jan Henrik Terheyden, Robert Finger, Hannah M P Dunbar, Marlene Sassmannshausen, Adnan Tufail, David P. Crabb, Alison M Binns, Zhichao Wu, Robyn H Guymer, Nadia Zakaria, Sergio Leal, Steffen Schmitz-Valckenberg, Ulrich F O Luhmann, Matthias Schmid, Frank G Holz; Validating a Confirmatory Structure-Function Model Prognostic of Progression of Intermediate AMD: MACUSTAR Study Primary Endpoint Analysis. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):4314.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To evaluate the prognostic performance of prospectively defined structural and functional risk factors of progression from intermediate age-related macular degeneration (iAMD) to late-stage AMD. This constitutes the pre-specified primary endpoint analysis of the longitudinal part of the European multi-center cohort study MACUSTAR.

Methods : Patients with iAMD were recruited at 20 clinical sites across seven European countries and underwent 6-monthly visits for up to 4 years. A battery of functional, structural, and patient-reported assessments was conducted. Beckman AMD stage and further structural AMD biomarkers were determined by a central reading center. A three-variable time-discrete subdistribution hazard model was pre-specified as the main analysis in the MACUSTAR statistical analysis plan. Based on data from the Laser Intervention in early stages of AMD (LEAD) study, the following baseline variables were selected: (i) functional: pointwise standard deviation in mesopic microperimetry (mesPSD), (ii) structural: presence of reticular pseudodrusen (RPD) in the study eye, (iii) age at baseline. The primary endpoint was progression to late AMD (geographic atrophy, GA or exudative macular neovascularization, MNV). Death or eye-related confounding events were considered competing events.

Results : A total of 585 participants with iAMD (mean age 72±6, 66% female, 27% with RPD, mean mesPSD 2.8±1.5 dB) with a median follow-up of 3 years were enrolled. Seven percent had late AMD in the fellow eye. Eighty-four eyes (14%) progressed to late AMD (GA: 38, MNV: 46), nine (2%) had an eye-related confounding event and 8 (1%) died during the study. Presence of RPD (hazard ratio, HR=3.44, p<0.001) and higher mesPSD (HR=1.24, p<0.001) were associated with AMD progression, while age at baseline was not (HR=1.03, p=0.082).

Conclusions : The primary endpoint analysis of the MACUSTAR study confirms the independent prognostic relevance of structural and functional risk factors for iAMD progression in a multi-center setting, in particular presence of RPD and mesPSD at baseline. Our results further support the use of structural and functional baseline variables as criteria for enrichment of trial populations for individuals with high risk of progression to late stage AMD.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×