Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 65, Issue 7
June 2024
Volume 65, Issue 7
Open Access
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2024
Effect of recent Eye Bank process modifications on fungal donor rim cultures and post-keratoplasty infection risk.
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Grace C. Tu
    University of Illinois Chicago College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, United States
  • David Wu
    University of Illinois Chicago College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, United States
  • Andrea Arteaga Useche
    University of Illinois Chicago Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Chicago, Illinois, United States
  • Katherine Chen
    University of Illinois Chicago Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Chicago, Illinois, United States
  • Jose de la Cruz
    University of Illinois Chicago Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Chicago, Illinois, United States
  • Ali R Djalilian
    University of Illinois Chicago Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Chicago, Illinois, United States
  • Maria Soledad Cortina
    University of Illinois Chicago Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Chicago, Illinois, United States
  • Elmer Y. Tu
    University of Illinois Chicago Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Chicago, Illinois, United States
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships   Grace Tu None; David Wu None; Andrea Arteaga Useche None; Katherine Chen None; Jose de la Cruz Gore, Alcon, Code C (Consultant/Contractor); Ali Djalilian Brightstar Therapeutics, Code C (Consultant/Contractor); Maria Soledad Cortina Eversight, Code S (non-remunerative); Elmer Tu Eversight, Code S (non-remunerative)
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIH P30 EY001792, Unrestricted Departmental Grant from Research to Prevent Blindness
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science June 2024, Vol.65, 4113. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Grace C. Tu, David Wu, Andrea Arteaga Useche, Katherine Chen, Jose de la Cruz, Ali R Djalilian, Maria Soledad Cortina, Elmer Y. Tu; Effect of recent Eye Bank process modifications on fungal donor rim cultures and post-keratoplasty infection risk.. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2024;65(7):4113.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose : To analyze effects of revised Eye Bank practices since 2017 on the rates of donor tissue contamination and post-keratoplasty fungal infections.

Methods : We conducted a retrospective chart review of a single-center, single Eye Bank database of corneal transplant patients from January 2018 - October 2023. Importantly, the single center cultures all donor rims and the Eye Bank has not offered antifungal supplementation. Clinical records were reviewed for positive donor rim cultures of any type. Recipients of positive fungal donor rim cultures (FDRCs) were analyzed for prior diagnosis, use of post-surgical antifungal prophylaxis with development of keratoplasty-related infection as the primary outcome measure. Therapeutic keratoplasties for fungal keratitis and Keratoprostheses were excluded.

Results : 111 positive donor rims were detected in 804 consecutive corneal transplant records reviewed. Of 28 positive FDRCs, 23 (20.7%) were Candida sp. The remaining FDRCs included 2 molds (Rhodotorula and Aspergillus species), 2 Cryptococcus sp. and 1 Clavispora sp. Penetrating keratoplasty (PKP)/deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) and Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK)/Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) comprised 49.8% and 44.5% of all transplants, respectively. Candida was detected in 11 of 400 (2.8%) PKP/DALK and 12 of 358 (3.4%) DSAEK/DMEK tissues. Chi-square testing did not detect a a significant difference (p = .64) between the two groups. No patients received antifungal prophylaxis for a positive FDRC, and no fungal infections identified post-operatively.

Conclusions : Prior studies demonstrated a 3 x greater rate of FDRC positivity for processed (DSAEK/DMEK) vs. unprocessed (PKP/DALK) tissues. These current results strongly suggest recent eye banking modifications, e.g. limiting warming times and double Betadine soaks, have largely eliminated the additional risk posed by tissue preparation on FDRCs without antifungal supplementation. Further, the rate of infection associated with a positive FDRC was far lower than previously reported without the use of antifungal prophylaxis. The lack of infections may be related to alterations in pathogenicity or infective load induced by new processing guidelines but should be accounted for in studies evaluating the benefit of post-surgical antifungal prophylaxis.

This abstract was presented at the 2024 ARVO Annual Meeting, held in Seattle, WA, May 5-9, 2024.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×